These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25213263)
1. Validation of a MOSFET dosemeter system for determining the absorbed and effective radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Manninen AL; Kotiaho A; Nikkinen J; Nieminen MT Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 25213263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a MOSFET radiation sensor for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology. Peet DJ; Pryor MD Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):562-8. PubMed ID: 10560338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential clinical utility of a fibre optic-coupled dosemeter for dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. Jones AK; Hintenlang D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18845674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamental study on the characteristics of a radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeter with no energy compensation filter for measuring patient entrance doses in cardiac interventional procedures. Kato M; Chida K; Moritake T; Koguchi Y; Sato T; Oosaka H; Tosa T; Kadowaki K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 24277872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The applicability of radiophotoluminescence dosemeter (RPLD) for measuring medical radiation (MR) doses. Manninen AL; Koivula A; Nieminen MT Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22232778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OPTIMIZATION OF A RADIOPHOTOLUMINESCENT GLASS DOSEMETER FOR OCCUPATIONAL EYE LENS DOSIMETRY IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY/CARDIOLOGY. Silva EH; Struelens L; Covens P; Ueno S; Koguchi Y; Vanhavere F; Buls N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 29584902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculated angular responses of an RPL dosemeter to photon and beta radiation. Hocine N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 22361351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of absorbed organ doses and effective dose based on body mass index in digital radiography. Kim H; Park M; Park S; Jeong H; Kim J; Kim Y Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22772453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin dose measurements using radiochromic films, TLDS and ionisation chamber and comparison with Monte Carlo simulation. Alashrah S; Kandaiya S; Maalej N; El-Taher A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 24300340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of physical performance of a scintillation dosemeter for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. de Sousa MC; Aubert B; Ricard M Br J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 73(876):1297-305. PubMed ID: 11205674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography. Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations]. Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo study of MOSFET dosemeter characteristics: dose dependence on photon energy, direction and dosemeter composition. Wang B; Xu XG; Kim CH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 15728424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doses measured using AEC on direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-rays systems: updated results with an RP 162 perspective. Bowden L; Faulkner R; Gallagher A; O'Connor U; Walsh C; Dowling A; O'Reilly G Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 23175645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The absorbed dose to the gonads in adult patients undergoing defecographic study by digital or traditional radiographic imaging]. Zonca G; De Thomatis A; Marchesini R; Sala S; Bozzini B; Cozzi G; Milella M; Salvetti M Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 9465219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography. Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of radiation dose in examination of the abdomen using different radiological imaging techniques. Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):478-84. PubMed ID: 8193895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]