126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25213263)
1. Validation of a MOSFET dosemeter system for determining the absorbed and effective radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.
Manninen AL; Kotiaho A; Nikkinen J; Nieminen MT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 25213263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a MOSFET radiation sensor for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology.
Peet DJ; Pryor MD
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):562-8. PubMed ID: 10560338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential clinical utility of a fibre optic-coupled dosemeter for dose measurements in diagnostic radiology.
Jones AK; Hintenlang D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18845674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamental study on the characteristics of a radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeter with no energy compensation filter for measuring patient entrance doses in cardiac interventional procedures.
Kato M; Chida K; Moritake T; Koguchi Y; Sato T; Oosaka H; Tosa T; Kadowaki K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 24277872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The applicability of radiophotoluminescence dosemeter (RPLD) for measuring medical radiation (MR) doses.
Manninen AL; Koivula A; Nieminen MT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22232778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OPTIMIZATION OF A RADIOPHOTOLUMINESCENT GLASS DOSEMETER FOR OCCUPATIONAL EYE LENS DOSIMETRY IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY/CARDIOLOGY.
Silva EH; Struelens L; Covens P; Ueno S; Koguchi Y; Vanhavere F; Buls N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 29584902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculated angular responses of an RPL dosemeter to photon and beta radiation.
Hocine N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 22361351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of absorbed organ doses and effective dose based on body mass index in digital radiography.
Kim H; Park M; Park S; Jeong H; Kim J; Kim Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22772453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin dose measurements using radiochromic films, TLDS and ionisation chamber and comparison with Monte Carlo simulation.
Alashrah S; Kandaiya S; Maalej N; El-Taher A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 24300340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of physical performance of a scintillation dosemeter for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology.
de Sousa MC; Aubert B; Ricard M
Br J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 73(876):1297-305. PubMed ID: 11205674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo study of MOSFET dosemeter characteristics: dose dependence on photon energy, direction and dosemeter composition.
Wang B; Xu XG; Kim CH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 15728424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doses measured using AEC on direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-rays systems: updated results with an RP 162 perspective.
Bowden L; Faulkner R; Gallagher A; O'Connor U; Walsh C; Dowling A; O'Reilly G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 23175645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The absorbed dose to the gonads in adult patients undergoing defecographic study by digital or traditional radiographic imaging].
Zonca G; De Thomatis A; Marchesini R; Sala S; Bozzini B; Cozzi G; Milella M; Salvetti M
Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 9465219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of radiation dose in examination of the abdomen using different radiological imaging techniques.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):478-84. PubMed ID: 8193895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
