These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25213454)

  • 1. Estimation of carcass composition and cut composition from computed tomography images of live growing pigs of different genotypes.
    Font-i-Furnols M; Carabús A; Pomar C; Gispert M
    Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):166-78. PubMed ID: 25213454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting fat, lean and the weights of primal cuts for growing pigs of different genotypes and sexes using computed tomography.
    Carabús A; Sainz RD; Oltjen JW; Gispert M; Font-i-Furnols M
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):1388-97. PubMed ID: 26020915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemical composition of growing pigs and its relationship with body tissue composition assessed by X-ray-computed tomography.
    Arthur PF; Barchia IM; Giles LR; Eamens GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3935-44. PubMed ID: 21821817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intramuscular fat content in different muscles, locations, weights and genotype-sexes and its prediction in live pigs with computed tomography.
    Font-I-Furnols M; Brun A; Gispert M
    Animal; 2019 Mar; 13(3):666-674. PubMed ID: 30111385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sex and dietary lysine on performances and serum and meat traits in finisher pigs.
    Suárez-Belloch J; Guada JA; Latorre MA
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1731-9. PubMed ID: 26144869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of carcass composition, ham and foreleg weights, and lean meat yields of Iberian pigs using ultrasound measurements in live animals.
    Ayuso D; González A; Hernández F; Corral JM; Izquierdo M
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1884-92. PubMed ID: 23408817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo estimation of goat carcass composition and body fat partition by real-time ultrasonography.
    Teixeira A; Joy M; Delfa R
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2369-76. PubMed ID: 18469057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of dietary lysine restriction during the finishing period on growth performance and carcass, meat, and fat characteristics of barrows and gilts intended for dry-cured ham production.
    Rodríguez-Sánchez JA; Sanz MA; Blanco M; Serrano MP; Joy M; Latorre MA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3651-62. PubMed ID: 21642490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive effects of dietary fat source and slaughter weight in growing-finishing swine: III. Carcass and fatty acid compositions.
    Apple JK; Maxwell CV; Galloway DL; Hamilton CR; Yancey JW
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1441-54. PubMed ID: 19066247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pork carcass composition: II. Use of indicator cuts for predicting carcass composition.
    Swensen K; Ellis M; Brewer MS; Novakofski J; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2405-14. PubMed ID: 9781497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
    van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting beef carcass composition using tissue weights of a primal cut assessed by computed tomography.
    Navajas EA; Richardson RI; Fisher AV; Hyslop JJ; Ross DW; Prieto N; Simm G; Roehe R
    Animal; 2010 Nov; 4(11):1810-7. PubMed ID: 22445141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of granulated barley as single major ingredient in the growing or finishing diet on productive performance, carcass, meat and fat quality of heavy pigs.
    Daza A; Latorre MA; López-Bote CJ
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1543-53. PubMed ID: 23031528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting tissue distribution and partitioning in terminal sire sheep using x-ray computed tomography.
    Macfarlane JM; Lewis RM; Emmans GC; Young MJ; Simm G
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 18641178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs.
    Latorre MA; Lázaro R; Valencia DG; Medel P; Mateos GG
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):526-33. PubMed ID: 14974552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lean content prediction in pig carcasses, loin and ham by computed tomography (CT) using a density model.
    Picouet PA; Teran F; Gispert M; Font i Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):616-22. PubMed ID: 20656413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of protein intake on rate of growth, protein deposition, and carcass traits of heavy Iberian pigs.
    Nieto R; Martínez-Pérez M; Haro A; Lara L; Aguilera JF
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3471-82. PubMed ID: 26440016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prediction of percentage of protein in pork carcasses.
    Johnson LP; Reagan JO; Haydon KD; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4176-84. PubMed ID: 2286559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.