These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25214305)
1. Perceptual failures in the selection and identification of low-prevalence targets in relative prevalence visual search. Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Riggs CA; Cave KR; Donnelly N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 25214305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search. Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the contribution of target repetition and target expectation to the emergence of the prevalence effect in visual search. Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Riggs CA; Taunton D; Cave KR; Donnel N Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 26597890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search. Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Zelinsky GJ Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):787-835. PubMed ID: 18954205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task. Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Found and missed: failing to recognize a search target despite moving it. Solman GJ; Cheyne JA; Smilek D Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 22240076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification. Rämä P; Baccino T Vis Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 27(5-6):187-92. PubMed ID: 20939937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance. Cole GG; Kuhn G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mask-onset delay paradigm and the availability of central and peripheral visual information during scene viewing. Glaholt MG; Rayner K; Reingold EM J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22247221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features. Feria CS Perception; 2012; 41(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 22808583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]