These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25214305)

  • 1. Perceptual failures in the selection and identification of low-prevalence targets in relative prevalence visual search.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Riggs CA; Cave KR; Donnelly N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 25214305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
    Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the contribution of target repetition and target expectation to the emergence of the prevalence effect in visual search.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Riggs CA; Taunton D; Cave KR; Donnel N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 26597890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 16236336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment.
    Mack SC; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of target typicality on categorical search.
    Maxfield JT; Stalder WD; Zelinsky GJ
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25274990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.
    Zelinsky GJ
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):787-835. PubMed ID: 18954205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task.
    Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Found and missed: failing to recognize a search target despite moving it.
    Solman GJ; Cheyne JA; Smilek D
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 22240076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification.
    Rämä P; Baccino T
    Vis Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 27(5-6):187-92. PubMed ID: 20939937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crowding degrades saccadic search performance.
    Vlaskamp BN; Hooge IT
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 15893785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mask-onset delay paradigm and the availability of central and peripheral visual information during scene viewing.
    Glaholt MG; Rayner K; Reingold EM
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22247221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features.
    Feria CS
    Perception; 2012; 41(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 22808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.