BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25214312)

  • 1. [DaVinci robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: benefit for obese men? - A matched-pair analysis].
    Beyer B; Kühne K; Böhm K; Schiffmann J; Heinzer H; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A; Steuber T
    Urologe A; 2015 Jan; 54(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 25214312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.
    Busch J; Gonzalgo ML; Leva N; Ferrari M; Cash H; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Miller K; Magheli A
    World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 24853030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD009625. PubMed ID: 28895658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
    Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.
    Alemozaffar M; Sanda M; Yecies D; Mucci LA; Stampfer MJ; Kenfield SA
    Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 24582327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
    Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Checcucci E; De Luca S; Passera R; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 28753822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].
    Otsuki H; Kuwahara Y; Nakamura K; Tsukamoto T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 104(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 24187850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan.
    Wu SY; Chang CL; Chen CI; Huang CC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2120156. PubMed ID: 34432012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of functional outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison study.
    Ku JY; Lee CH; Lee JZ; Ha HK
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 13(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 27667779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients.
    Busch J; Magheli A; Leva N; Hinz S; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Fuller TF; Miller K; Gonzalgo ML
    World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1411-6. PubMed ID: 24609219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
    Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.
    Martinschek A; Heinzelmann K; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L
    J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 22489895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cao L; Yang Z; Qi L; Chen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15770. PubMed ID: 31145297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.