These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25214637)

  • 1. Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.
    Chhapola V; Kanwal SK; Brar R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2015 May; 52(Pt 3):382-6. PubMed ID: 25214637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding Bland Altman analysis.
    Giavarina D
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 26110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting Standards for a Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews.
    Gerke O
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 32456091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use and reporting of Bland-Altman analyses in studies of self-reported versus measured weight and height.
    Flegal KM; Graubard B; Ioannidis JPA
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2020 Jun; 44(6):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 31792334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.
    Mantha S; Roizen MF; Fleisher LA; Thisted R; Foss J
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Mar; 90(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 10702443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.
    Parsons NR; Hiskens R; Price CL; Achten J; Costa ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1154-9. PubMed ID: 21911523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study.
    Aghazadeh-Attari J; Mobaraki K; Ahmadzadeh J; Mansorian B; Mohebbi I
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 May; 11(1):266. PubMed ID: 29720270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals.
    Rauh SL; Turner D; Jellison S; Allison DB; Fugate C; Foote G; Vassar M
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2021 Feb; 29(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 33340283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):e1-5. PubMed ID: 23538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports.
    Abu-Arafeh A; Jordan H; Drummond G
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Nov; 117(5):569-575. PubMed ID: 27799171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.
    Nieminen P; Carpenter J; Rucker G; Schumacher M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16948835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to use difference plots in quantitative method comparison studies.
    Twomey PJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16536914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions.
    Kunath F; Grobe HR; Rücker G; Engehausen D; Antes G; Wullich B; Meerpohl JJ
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22104723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.
    Chan L; Heinemann AW; Roberts J
    Am J Occup Ther; 2014; 68(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 24581397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):357-63. PubMed ID: 12880535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials published in Iranian journals: application of the new version of consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Nojomi M; Ramezani M; Ghafari-Anvar A
    Arch Iran Med; 2013 Jan; 16(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 23273230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.