These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25215130)
1. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis. Luo XR; Zhang HL; Chen GJ; Ding WS; Huang L World J Emerg Med; 2013; 4(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 25215130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lafuente-Lafuente C; Melero-Bascones M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD002751. PubMed ID: 11687024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Wolcke BB; Mauer DK; Schoefmann MF; Teichmann H; Provo TA; Lindner KH; Dick WF; Aeppli D; Lurie KG Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(18):2201-5. PubMed ID: 14568898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a prospective, randomized study in a two-tiered EMS system with physicians in the field. Mauer D; Schneider T; Dick W; Withelm A; Elich D; Mauer M Resuscitation; 1996 Dec; 33(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9025128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lafuente-Lafuente C; Melero-Bascones M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (2):CD002751. PubMed ID: 15106176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lafuente-Lafuente C; Melero-Bascones M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD002751. PubMed ID: 12137656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Lurie KG; Shultz JJ; Callaham ML; Schwab TM; Gisch T; Rector T; Frascone RJ; Long L JAMA; 1994 May; 271(18):1405-11. PubMed ID: 8176802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety of active abdominal compression-decompression versus standard CPR for cardiac arrests: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 RCTs. Wang JP; Zhang YM; Yang RJ; Zhang K; Chai MM; Zhou DC Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():132-139. PubMed ID: 31561009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial of active compression-decompression CPR vs standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in two cities. Schwab TM; Callaham ML; Madsen CD; Utecht TA JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(16):1261-8. PubMed ID: 7715038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lafuente-Lafuente C; Melero-Bascones M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):CD002751. PubMed ID: 24052483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the inspiratory impedance threshold device: state of the art. Frascone RJ; Bitz D; Lurie K Curr Opin Crit Care; 2004 Jun; 10(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 15166836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Zhu N; Chen Q; Jiang Z; Liao F; Kou B; Tang H; Zhou M Crit Care; 2019 Mar; 23(1):100. PubMed ID: 30917840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Wang PL; Brooks SC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD007260. PubMed ID: 30125048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Li H; Wang D; Yu Y; Zhao X; Jing X Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Feb; 24():10. PubMed ID: 26830837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Interposed abdominal pulling-pressing cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve the resuscitation effect for patients with cardiac arrest]. Wang D; Feng X; Han Y Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 May; 30(5):466-470. PubMed ID: 29764553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sood N; Sangari A; Goyal A; Sun C; Horinek M; Hauger JA; Perry L World J Cardiol; 2023 Oct; 15(10):531-541. PubMed ID: 37900903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival outcome among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhou G; Wang Y; Sun Z; Yuan M; Ma Y; Wu Q; Wu C; Xu J; Li Y; Liu Y; Wang Z; Song C Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):8. PubMed ID: 36600249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with active abdominal compression-decompression]. Zhan F; Song W; Zhang J; Li M; Chen W Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Feb; 31(2):228-231. PubMed ID: 30827315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled sequential elevation of the head and thorax combined with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an impedance threshold device improves neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Moore JC; Salverda B; Rojas-Salvador C; Lick M; Debaty G; G Lurie K Resuscitation; 2021 Jan; 158():220-227. PubMed ID: 33027619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]