These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25216128)

  • 1. Anatomical study of the pterygomaxillary area for implant placement: cone beam computed tomographic scanning in 100 patients.
    Rodríguez X; Rambla F; De Marcos Lopez L; Méndez V; Vela X; Jiménez Garcia J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1049-52. PubMed ID: 25216128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical and radiological approach to pterygoid implants: a cross-sectional study of 202 cone beam computed tomography examinations.
    Rodríguez X; Lucas-Taulé E; Elnayef B; Altuna P; Gargallo-Albiol J; Peñarrocha Diago M; Hernandez-Alfaro F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 26768019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic analysis of critical anatomical structures for pterygoid implant placement in Chinese patients with a severely atrophied maxilla.
    Zhang Q; Abdelrehem A; Qu XZ; Zhang CP; Ong HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 52(9):998-1004. PubMed ID: 36710239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
    Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the pterygomaxillary region: clinical and radiologic study of 454 implants.
    Rodríguez X; Méndez V; Vela X; Segalà M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1547-53. PubMed ID: 23189309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography and anatomical measurements of critical sites for endosseous implants in the pterygomaxillary region: a cadaveric study.
    Uchida Y; Yamashita Y; Danjo A; Shibata K; Kuraoka A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 46(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 28254262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
    Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective study of 68 implants placed in the pterygomaxillary region using drills and osteotomes.
    Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Peñarrocha M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 19885414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial Fenestration and Dehiscence Defects Associated With Immediate Implant Placement Without Flap Elevation in Anterior Maxillary Ridge: A Preliminary Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Lin CY; Pan WL; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1112-1118. PubMed ID: 30231099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the pterygomaxillary fissure and pterygopalatine fossa using 3D rendering programs.
    Icen M; Orhan K
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 May; 41(5):513-522. PubMed ID: 30725218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study.
    Roe P; Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Zimmerman G; Mesquida J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 22442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.
    Shinohara A; Motoyoshi M; Uchida Y; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation.
    Sun Y; Xu C; Wang N; Wu Y; Liu Y; Fan S; Wang F
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Mar; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 36971973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
    Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying an optimal approach for the placement of pterygoid implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Chen J; Bu L; Xu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):917.e1-917.e13. PubMed ID: 38443244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.
    Peñarrocha M; Viña JA; Carrillo C; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):e322-30. PubMed ID: 22538025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging.
    Cantarella D; Dominguez-Mompell R; Mallya SM; Moschik C; Pan HC; Miller J; Moon W
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Nov; 18(1):34. PubMed ID: 29090368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.