These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25216134)

  • 1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites.
    Lee SA; Lee CT; Fu MM; Elmisalati W; Chuang SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1085-97. PubMed ID: 25216134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions for Dental Implant Placement in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibles: Vertical Bone Augmentation and Alternative Treatments. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Camps-Font O; Burgueño-Barris G; Figueiredo R; Jung RE; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Periodontol; 2016 Dec; 87(12):1444-1457. PubMed ID: 27468794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Altaib FH; Alqutaibi AY; Al-Fahd A; Eid S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):636-650. PubMed ID: 31372602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Vazouras K; Gholami H; Pagni S; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():8-20. PubMed ID: 30328206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
    Thoma DS; Zeltner M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():154-69. PubMed ID: 25997901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.
    Fan T; Li Y; Deng WW; Wu T; Zhang W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 27295262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review.
    Nisand D; Picard N; Rocchietta I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():170-9. PubMed ID: 26129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.
    Yu X; Xu R; Zhang Z; Yang Y; Deng F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8152. PubMed ID: 33854095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short dental implants: a systematic review.
    Annibali S; Cristalli MP; Dell'Aquila D; Bignozzi I; La Monaca G; Pilloni A
    J Dent Res; 2012 Jan; 91(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22034499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Felice P; Pellegrino G; Checchi L; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1394-403. PubMed ID: 20678136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; Batista VES; Oliveira HFFE; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e86. PubMed ID: 30231176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical techniques used in the rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients with atrophic posterior mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Toti P; Marchionni S; Menchini-Fabris GB; Marconcini S; Covani U; Barone A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 28552200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu X; Huang J; Fu X; Kuang Y; Yue H; Song J; Xu L
    J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 32479956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Monje A; Fu JH; Chan HL; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1783-91. PubMed ID: 23451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapeutic concepts and methods for improving dental implant outcomes. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015.
    Sanz M; Donos N; Alcoforado G; Balmer M; Gurzawska K; Mardas N; Milinkovic I; Nisand D; Rocchietta I; Stavropoulos A; Thoma DS; Torsello F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():202-6. PubMed ID: 26385630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.