These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25216142)
1. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Yunus N; Saub R; Taiyeb Ali TB; Salleh NM; Baig MR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 25216142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch. Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial. Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of elderly Turkish edentulous patients. Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011; 53(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 21183231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. Harris D; Höfer S; O'Boyle CA; Sheridan S; Marley J; Benington IC; Clifford T; Houston F; O'Connell B Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 22111872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants. Zygogiannis K; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 29340354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of three-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year retrospective study. Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E Quintessence Int; 2011 Oct; 42(9):721-8. PubMed ID: 21909496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants. Paleari AG; Oliveira Junior NM; Marin DOM; Rodriguez LS; Arioli Filho JN; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Oct; 26():e20160628. PubMed ID: 30304120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures. Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, Peri-Implant and Kinesiograph Parameters in Wearers of One-or Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures. Policastro VB; Paleari AG; Leite ARP; Mendoza-Marin DO; Cassiano AFB; Shaddox LM; Compagnoni MA; Pero AC J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):757-765. PubMed ID: 29679427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bar, Telescopic, and Locator Attachments for Implant-Stabilized Overdentures in Patients with Mandibular Atrophied Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. ElSyad MA; Denewar BA; Elsaih EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1103-1111. PubMed ID: 30231098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]