BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25216482)

  • 1. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised blind image quality assessment via joint spatial and transform features.
    Yang C; He Q; An P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):10865. PubMed ID: 37407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs.
    Kede Ma ; Wentao Liu ; Tongliang Liu ; Zhou Wang ; Dacheng Tao
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3951-3964. PubMed ID: 28574353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilizing image scales towards totally training free blind image quality assessment.
    Saha A; Wu QM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1879-92. PubMed ID: 25775489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blind quality assessment of authentically distorted images.
    Celona L; Schettini R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Jun; 39(6):B1-B10. PubMed ID: 36215522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Multiscale Approach to Deep Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Liu M; Huang J; Zeng D; Ding X; Paisley J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023 Feb; PP():. PubMed ID: 37027757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain.
    Mittal A; Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Dec; 21(12):4695-708. PubMed ID: 22910118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3339-52. PubMed ID: 22453635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis.
    Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using HVS Dual-Pathway and Contrast Sensitivity to Blindly Assess Image Quality.
    Chen F; Fu H; Yu H; Chu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 37430884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractal analysis for reduced reference image quality assessment.
    Xu Y; Liu D; Quan Y; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jul; 24(7):2098-109. PubMed ID: 25794391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.