BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25216904)

  • 1. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.
    Han MS; Peters JH
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Oct; 24(4):581-94. PubMed ID: 25216904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
    López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acid and nonacid reflux monitoring.
    Carlson DA; Pandolfino JE
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2014 Mar; 43(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 24503361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gastroesophageal reflux monitoring: pH (catheter and capsule) and impedance.
    Hong SK; Vaezi MF
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2009 Jan; 19(1):1-22, v. PubMed ID: 19232277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current applications of evolving methodologies in gastroesophageal reflux disease testing.
    Weber C; Davis CS; Fisichella PM
    Dig Liver Dis; 2011 May; 43(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 21324762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impedance-pH testing.
    Villa N; Vela MF
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2013 Mar; 42(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 23452628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of esophageal motility and reflux in children treated for esophageal atresia with the use of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring.
    Di Pace MR; Caruso AM; Catalano P; Casuccio A; Cimador M; De Grazia E
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Mar; 46(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 21376190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring.
    Sifrim D; Fornari F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Mar; 40(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 18082474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring after repair of esophageal atresia.
    Fröhlich T; Otto S; Weber P; Pilic D; Schmidt-Choudhury A; Wenzl TG; Köhler H
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Oct; 47(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 18852636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Will esophageal impedance replace pH monitoring?
    Vandenplas Y; Salvatore S; Vieira MC; Hauser B
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jan; 119(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 17200278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The diagnostic impact and limitations of 24 hour pH monitoring with multichannel intraluminal impedance].
    Korszun K; Dyrla P; Wojtuń S; Gil J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2014 Aug; 37(218):73-6. PubMed ID: 25252438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of esophageal impedance/pH monitoring in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, on and off therapy.
    Pritchett JM; Aslam M; Slaughter JC; Ness RM; Garrett CG; Vaezi MF
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Jul; 7(7):743-8. PubMed ID: 19281866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Emerenziani S; Sifrim D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 21(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 15930987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.
    Roman S; Gyawali CP; Savarino E; Yadlapati R; Zerbib F; Wu J; Vela M; Tutuian R; Tatum R; Sifrim D; Keller J; Fox M; Pandolfino JE; Bredenoord AJ;
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Oct; 29(10):1-15. PubMed ID: 28370768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing.
    Hirano I; Richter JE;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Mar; 102(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 17335450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Previous wireless pH monitoring study overlooked.
    Hochman J
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 May; 46(5):607; author reply 607. PubMed ID: 18493221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The diagnostic value of multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance and pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux-related cough].
    Liu B; Yu L; Qiu ZH; Xu XH; Lü HJ; Xu SC; Chen Y; Qiu ZM
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 51(11):867-70. PubMed ID: 23291024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New technologies to evaluate esophageal function.
    Ravi K; Francis DL
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Nov; 4(6):829-37. PubMed ID: 18035949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.