248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25218330)
1. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
Chung ES; Kim Y
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate.
Kim Y; Chung ES
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():88-102. PubMed ID: 24365586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model.
Nguyen PH; Tran TH; Thi Nguyen LA; Pham HA; Thi Pham MA
Heliyon; 2023 Dec; 9(12):e22353. PubMed ID: 38144291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders management using Fuzzy TOPSIS Assessment of Repetitive Tasks (ART).
Khandan M; Koohpaei AR; Nili M; Farjami Y
Work; 2017; 56(2):267-276. PubMed ID: 28234261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder multi-criteria methodology for water allocation and reuse in metropolitan areas.
Pourmand E; Mahjouri N
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):444. PubMed ID: 29961116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model.
Tang C; Xu D; Chen N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5548-5565. PubMed ID: 32970262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions.
Chen TY
Artif Intell Rev; 2023; 56(7):7347-7401. PubMed ID: 36536928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.
Sultan A; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M; Shekhovtsov A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extension of correlation coefficient based TOPSIS technique for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy soft set: A case study in extract, transform, and load techniques.
Zulqarnain RM; Siddique I; Asif M; Ahmad H; Askar S; Gurmani SH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287032. PubMed ID: 37903157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets.
Ma Q; Sun H; Chen Z; Tan Y
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294596. PubMed ID: 38011124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An integrated fuzzy approach for strategic alliance partner selection in third-party logistics.
Erkayman B; Gundogar E; Yilmaz A
ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():486306. PubMed ID: 23365520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
Rashidi F; Sharifian S
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method.
Alkan N; Kahraman C
Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Oct; 110():107653. PubMed ID: 34226821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
