These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2521904)

  • 21. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating tactile aids for speech perception and production by hearing-impaired adults and children.
    Weisenberger JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():188-200. PubMed ID: 2069181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integration of visual and tactile modalities.
    Summers IR; Du J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():29-33. PubMed ID: 9428041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor by profoundly hearing-impaired children in a total communication environment.
    Galvin KL; Cowan RS; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Oct; 2(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 1837739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.
    Sparks DW; Kuhl PK; Edmonds AE; Gray GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):246-57. PubMed ID: 632417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two speech processing schemes using normal-hearing subjects.
    Tong YC; Harrison JM; Huigen J; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():135-9. PubMed ID: 2141444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual-auditory integration during speech imitation in autism.
    Williams JH; Massaro DW; Peel NJ; Bosseler A; Suddendorf T
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(6):559-75. PubMed ID: 15541632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition with the advanced combination encoder and transient emphasis spectral maxima strategies in nucleus 24 recipients.
    Holden LK; Vandali AE; Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):681-701. PubMed ID: 16197281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tactile-auditory speech perception by unimodally and bimodally trained normal-hearing subjects.
    Alcántara JI; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 8471791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception.
    Summerfield Q
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jan; 335(1273):71-8. PubMed ID: 1348140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.
    Pandey PC; Kunov H; Abel SM
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 3610989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual influences on speech perception in children with autism.
    Iarocci G; Rombough A; Yager J; Weeks DJ; Chua R
    Autism; 2010 Jul; 14(4):305-20. PubMed ID: 20591957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech feature recognition by profoundly hearing impaired children using a multiple-channel electrotactile speech processor and aided residual hearing.
    Alcántara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1260-73. PubMed ID: 2146295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. INDSCAL analysis of perceptual judgments for 24 consonants via visual, tactile, and visual-tactile inputs.
    Danhauer JL; Appel MA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 1271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.