These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25220630)
21. Time Efficiency in Stereotactic Robot-Assisted Surgery: An Appraisal of the Surgical Procedure and Surgeon's Learning Curve. Machetanz K; Grimm F; Schuhmann M; Tatagiba M; Gharabaghi A; Naros G Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2021; 99(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 33017833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks. Leijte E; Claassen L; Arts E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32314094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of Spatial Cognitive Ability on Gain in Robot-Assisted Surgical Skills of Urological Surgeons. Teishima J; Hattori M; Inoue S; Hieda K; Kobatake K; Shinmei S; Egi H; Ohdan H; Matsubara A J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 27052203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis. Catchpole K; Perkins C; Bresee C; Solnik MJ; Sherman B; Fritch J; Gross B; Jagannathan S; Hakami-Majd N; Avenido R; Anger JT Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3749-61. PubMed ID: 26675938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive Validation of a Robotic Virtual Reality Simulator: The Tube 3 module for Practicing Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Shim JS; Noh TI; Kim JY; Pyun JH; Cho S; Oh MM; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kim JJ; Kang SG Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():32-36. PubMed ID: 30144481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Training in robotic surgery: simulators, surgery, and credentialing. Bahler CD; Sundaram CP Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):581-9. PubMed ID: 25306169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS). Frederick PJ; Szender JB; Hussein AA; Kesterson JP; Shelton JA; Anderson TL; Barnabei VM; Guru K J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 27780777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Training in Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resections: a paradigm shift away from "See one, Do one, Teach one". Hogg ME; Besselink MG; Clavien PA; Fingerhut A; Jeyarajah DR; Kooby DA; Moser AJ; Pitt HA; Varban OA; Vollmer CM; Zeh HJ; Hansen P; HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):234-245. PubMed ID: 28190709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Smith R; Patel V; Satava R Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 24277315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Initial learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy performed by a single experienced robotic surgeon. Motoyama D; Matsushita Y; Watanabe H; Tamura K; Suzuki T; Ito T; Sugiyama T; Otsuka A; Miyake H Asian J Endosc Surg; 2020 Jan; 13(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 30689309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A query on da Vinci robot console preferences: insights for the novice surgeon. Sorokin I; Cadeddu JA J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):231-233. PubMed ID: 27844267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Value of Learning Curve During Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Thoughts and Feelings. Marino MV Surg Innov; 2020 Feb; 27(1):124-125. PubMed ID: 31540561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges. MacCraith E; Forde JC; Davis NF J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 30796671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measuring to Improve: Peer and Crowd-sourced Assessments of Technical Skill with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Ghani KR; Miller DC; Linsell S; Brachulis A; Lane B; Sarle R; Dalela D; Menon M; Comstock B; Lendvay TS; Montie J; Peabody JO; Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):547-550. PubMed ID: 26755338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Best Practices for Robotic Surgery Programs. Estes SJ; Goldenberg D; Winder JS; Juza RM; Lyn-Sue JR JSLS; 2017; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 28729780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach? Brinkman W; de Angst I; Schreuder H; Schout B; Draaisma W; Verweij L; Hendrikx A; van der Poel H Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):281-287. PubMed ID: 27194262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skill: A Valid Method for Discriminating Basic Robotic Surgery Skills. White LW; Kowalewski TM; Dockter RL; Comstock B; Hannaford B; Lendvay TS J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1295-301. PubMed ID: 26057232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]