These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25220813)

  • 1. Descending control of neural bias and selectivity in a spatial attention network: rules and mechanisms.
    Mysore SP; Knudsen EI
    Neuron; 2014 Oct; 84(1):214-226. PubMed ID: 25220813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorical Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus by an Inhibitory Midbrain Nucleus.
    Schryver HM; Straka M; Mysore SP
    J Neurosci; 2020 May; 40(21):4172-4184. PubMed ID: 32300047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection.
    Mysore SP; Knudsen EI
    Nat Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 16(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23475112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially precise visual gain control mediated by a cholinergic circuit in the midbrain attention network.
    Asadollahi A; Knudsen EI
    Nat Commun; 2016 Nov; 7():13472. PubMed ID: 27853140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Space coding by gamma oscillations in the barn owl optic tectum.
    Sridharan D; Boahen K; Knudsen EI
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 105(5):2005-17. PubMed ID: 21325681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Top-down control of multimodal sensitivity in the barn owl optic tectum.
    Winkowski DE; Knudsen EI
    J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 27(48):13279-91. PubMed ID: 18045922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-based auditory and visual attention.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):182-6. PubMed ID: 18396091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gated visual input to the central auditory system.
    Gutfreund Y; Zheng W; Knudsen EI
    Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5586):1556-9. PubMed ID: 12202831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.
    Pérez ML; Peña JL
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):783-90. PubMed ID: 16424454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between stimulus-specific adaptation and visual auditory integration in the forebrain of the barn owl.
    Reches A; Netser S; Gutfreund Y
    J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(20):6991-8. PubMed ID: 20484641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention.
    Wu CT; Weissman DH; Roberts KC; Woldorff MG
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1134(1):187-98. PubMed ID: 17204249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.
    Winkowski DE; Knudsen EI
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):336-9. PubMed ID: 16421572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation in the auditory space map of the barn owl.
    Gutfreund Y; Knudsen EI
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 96(2):813-25. PubMed ID: 16707713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory and multisensory responses in the tectofugal pathway of the barn owl.
    Reches A; Gutfreund Y
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 29(30):9602-13. PubMed ID: 19641123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.
    Lai D; Brandt S; Luksch H; Wessel R
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 105(2):793-805. PubMed ID: 21160008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 195(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 19436999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global inhibition and stimulus competition in the owl optic tectum.
    Mysore SP; Asadollahi A; Knudsen EI
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(5):1727-38. PubMed ID: 20130182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signaling of the strongest stimulus in the owl optic tectum.
    Mysore SP; Asadollahi A; Knudsen EI
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5186-96. PubMed ID: 21471353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of a midbrain network in competitive stimulus selection.
    Mysore SP; Knudsen EI
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2011 Aug; 21(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 21696945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.