These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25220905)

  • 1. Plug-in tests for nonequivalence of means of independent normal populations.
    Choi S; Park J
    Biom J; 2014 Nov; 56(6):1016-34. PubMed ID: 25220905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference concerning a common dispersion of several treatment groups in the analysis of over/underdispersed count data.
    Saha KK
    Biom J; 2014 May; 56(3):441-60. PubMed ID: 24446132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ANOVA and the variance homogeneity assumption: Exploring a better gatekeeper.
    Kim YJ; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28568313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining sample size when assessing mean equivalence.
    Asberg A; Solem KB; Mikkelsen G
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Nov; 74(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 25228313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for variability in sample size estimation with applications to nonadherence and estimation of variance and effect size.
    Fay MP; Halloran ME; Follmann DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 17688499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Laird NM; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 9544513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous inference for several quantiles of a normal population with applications.
    Liu W; Bretz F; Hayter AJ; Glimm E
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 23169429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means under normal distribution theory.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests of independence for bivariate survival data.
    Shih JH; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 8962462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjusted p-values for SGoF multiple test procedure.
    Castro-Conde I; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 25323102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On testing equivalence of three populations.
    Wiens BL; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Aug; 9(3):465-83. PubMed ID: 10473032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the agreement of two quantitative assays with repeated measurements.
    Zhong B; Shao J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 12635904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small-sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations.
    Guo X; Pan W; Connett JE; Hannan PJ; French SA
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3479-95. PubMed ID: 15977302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Bjørkestøl K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 20528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.