BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

998 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25221334)

  • 1. Model-based navigation of left and right ventricular leads to optimal targets for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single-center feasibility study.
    Laksman Z; Yee R; Stirrat J; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Manlucu J; McCarty D; Turkistani Y; Scholl D; Rajchl M; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson RT; Drangova M; White JA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1040-7. PubMed ID: 25221334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial.
    St John Sutton M; Plappert T; Adamson PB; Li P; Christman SA; Chung ES; Curtis AB
    Circ Heart Fail; 2015 May; 8(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 25697851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Wong JA; Yee R; Stirrat J; Scholl D; Krahn AD; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Klein GJ; McCarty D; Fine N; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson T; Drangova M; White JA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 6(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 23741053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations.
    Salden OAE; van den Broek HT; van Everdingen WM; Mohamed Hoesein FAA; Velthuis BK; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ; Tuinenburg AE; Leufkens P; van Slochteren FJ; Meine M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 30847659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Poulsen SH; Böttcher M; Nørgaard BL; Bouchelouche K; Mortensen PT; Gerdes C; Nielsen JC
    Trials; 2013 Apr; 14():113. PubMed ID: 23782792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study.
    Linde C; Gold MR; Abraham WT; St John Sutton M; Ghio S; Cerkvenik J; Daubert C;
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Sep; 34(33):2592-9. PubMed ID: 23641006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex ≥120 milliseconds.
    Thibault B; Ducharme A; Harel F; White M; O'Meara E; Guertin MC; Lavoie J; Frasure-Smith N; Dubuc M; Guerra P; Macle L; Rivard L; Roy D; Talajic M; Khairy P;
    Circulation; 2011 Dec; 124(25):2874-81. PubMed ID: 22104549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical implication of right ventricular to left ventricular interlead sensed electrical delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Kristiansen HM; Hovstad T; Vollan G; Keilegavlen H; Faerestrand S
    Europace; 2012 Jul; 14(7):986-93. PubMed ID: 22308084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: PROSPECT-ECG substudy.
    Hsing JM; Selzman KA; Leclercq C; Pires LA; McLaughlin MG; McRae SE; Peterson BJ; Zimetbaum PJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 4(6):851-7. PubMed ID: 21956038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
    Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic benefit of optimum left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: follow-up of the TARGET Study Cohort (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).
    Kydd AC; Khan FZ; Watson WD; Pugh PJ; Virdee MS; Dutka DP
    JACC Heart Fail; 2014 Jun; 2(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 24952685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Taylor RJ; Umar F; Panting JR; Stegemann B; Leyva F
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):481-9. PubMed ID: 26498258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
    Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.
    Lenarczyk R; Kowalski O; Sredniawa B; Pruszkowska-Skrzep P; Mazurek M; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Woźniak A; Pluta S; Głowacki J; Kalarus Z
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1228-36. PubMed ID: 22651239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT).
    Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):600. PubMed ID: 30382923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing lead position and cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived wall motion patterns: a prospective cohort study.
    Hartlage GR; Suever JD; Clement-Guinaudeau S; Strickland PT; Ghasemzadeh N; Magrath RP; Parikh A; Lerakis S; Hoskins MH; Leon AR; Lloyd MS; Oshinski JN
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jul; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 26170046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Left ventricular wall motion analysis to guide management of CRT non-responders.
    Nitsche B; Eitel C; Bode K; Wetzel U; Richter S; Döring M; Hindricks G; Piorkowski C; Gaspar T
    Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 25825461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with right ventricular sense triggered left ventricular pacing benefits for the hemodynamics compared with standard CRT for chronic congestive heart failure: A cross-over study.
    Pu LJ; Wang Y; Zhao L; Luo ZL; Hua BT; Han MH; Li SM; Yang J; Li L; Peng YZ; Guo T
    Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25179313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of ejection fraction on the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure.
    Linde C; Daubert C; Abraham WT; St John Sutton M; Ghio S; Hassager C; Herre JM; Bergemann TL; Gold MR;
    Circ Heart Fail; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1180-9. PubMed ID: 24014828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute effects of withdrawal of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left and right ventricular function, dyssynchrony, and contractile function in patients with New York Heart Association functional class I/II heart failure: MADIT-CRT.
    Knappe D; Pouleur AC; Shah AM; Bourgoun M; Brown MW; Foster E; Pfeffer MA; Moss AJ; Solomon SD;
    J Card Fail; 2013 Mar; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 23482074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.