181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25222162)
1. Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Berndl A; El-Chaar D; Murphy K; McDonald S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Aug; 36(8):678-687. PubMed ID: 25222162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mL or 60mL: A randomized controlled trial.
Sandberg EM; Schepers EM; Sitter RLV; Huisman CMA; Wijngaarden WJV
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Apr; 211():150-155. PubMed ID: 28260689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gu N; Ru T; Wang Z; Dai Y; Zheng M; Xu B; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136856. PubMed ID: 26322635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Ten Eikelder ML; van Pampus MG; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van der Post JA; van der Salm P; Scheepers HC; Schuitemaker N; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 23870188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter.
Levy R; Ferber A; Ben-Arie A; Paz B; Hazan Y; Blickstein I; Hagay ZJ
BJOG; 2002 Feb; 109(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 11888099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Baradwan S; Alshahrani MS; AlSghan R; Sabban H; Khadawardi K; Alyafi M; Hafedh B; Alayed NM; Rashed ZF; Abdel-Hakam FA; Elshabrawi MN; Abdelhakim AM; Ahmed WE
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 53(5):102770. PubMed ID: 38503382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 mL and 80 mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section.
Manish P; Rathore S; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
Trop Doct; 2016 Oct; 46(4):205-211. PubMed ID: 26774112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang F; Huang S; Long Y; Huang L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29271034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.
Chen W; Xue J; Gaudet L; Walker M; Wen SW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 25794821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):539-551. PubMed ID: 26244535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter.
Austin K; Chambers GM; de Abreu Lourenco R; Madan A; Susic D; Henry A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 26173911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study.
Solt I; Frank Wolf M; Ben-Haroush S; Kaminskyi S; Ophir E; Bornstein J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(7):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 31185762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoen CN; Saccone G; Backley S; Sandberg EM; Gu N; Delaney S; Berghella V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Sep; 97(9):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 29607491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
