181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25222162)
21. The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use.
Sciscione AC; Bedder CL; Hoffman MK; Ruhstaller K; Shlossman PA
Am J Perinatol; 2014 Oct; 31(9):781-6. PubMed ID: 24347259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Fruhman G; Gavard JA; Amon E; Flick KV; Miller C; Gross GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):67.e1-67.e9. PubMed ID: 27640940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
Chia HM; Tan PC; Tan SP; Hamdan M; Omar SZ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):330. PubMed ID: 32471369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial.
Rab MT; Mohammed AB; Zahran KA; Hassan MM; Eldeen AR; Ebrahim EM; Yehia M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jul; 28(10):1181-5. PubMed ID: 25048751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel side by side Foley catheter balloons for 'extended labour induction': Concept, simulation study and clinical application.
Hofmeyr GJ; Dalmacio R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():133-137. PubMed ID: 34634672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inner thigh taping vs traction for cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: a randomized controlled trial.
Gibson KS; Mercer BM; Louis JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):272.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23685080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study.
Jozwiak M; van de Lest HA; Burger NB; Dijksterhuis MG; De Leeuw JW
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Mar; 93(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 24354335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review.
Diederen M; Gommers J; Wilkinson C; Turnbull D; Mol B
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 29211328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with Foley catheter: A prospective study of 41 patients].
Lamourdedieu C; Gnisci A; Marcelli M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Agostini A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 May; 44(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 25201021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors for cesarean section after using the Foley catheter for labor induction.
Beta J; Issat T; Nowicka MA; Jakimiuk AJ
Ginekol Pol; 2013 May; 84(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 23819401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Induction of labor using Foley catheter with weight attached versus without weight attached: A randomized control trial.
Cherian AG; Marcus TA; Sebastian T; Rathore S; Mathews JE
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 157(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 33930187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Rath W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():44-50. PubMed ID: 27521597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Pettker CM; Pocock SB; Smok DP; Lee SM; Devine PC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Liu Y; Duan Y; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2382-8. PubMed ID: 26427519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review.
Li L; Wen J; Wang L; Li YP; Li Y
BJOG; 2011 Mar; 118(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 21176084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour at term with a Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E₂ gel (PROBAAT trial).
van Baaren GJ; Jozwiak M; Opmeer BC; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; Dijksterhuis MG; van Huizen ME; van der Salm PC; Schuitemaker NW; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman M; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):987-95. PubMed ID: 23530729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
