These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25222610)
1. Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benign. Batchelder KA; Tanenbaum AB; Albert S; Guimond L; Kestener P; Arneodo A; Khalil A PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107580. PubMed ID: 25222610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractal analysis of mammographic lesions: a feasibility study quantifying the difference between benign and malignant masses. Velanovich V Am J Med Sci; 1996 May; 311(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 8615395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening. Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational growth model of breast microcalcification clusters in simulated mammographic environments. Plourde SM; Marin Z; Smith ZR; Toner BC; Batchelder KA; Khalil A Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():7-13. PubMed ID: 27380025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes. Thiele DL; Kimme-Smith C; Johnson TD; McCombs M; Bassett LW Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 9157269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications. Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis. Gowri V; Valluvan KR; Chamundeeswari VV Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3093-3098. PubMed ID: 30486547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks. Bocchi L; Coppini G; Nori J; Valli G Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 15121055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach. Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views. Gupta S; Markey MK Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms. Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new fast fractal modeling approach for the detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Sankar D; Thomas T J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19618243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fractal analysis in the diagnosis of breast tumors]. Crişan DA; Lesaru M; Dobrescu R; Vasilescu C Chirurgia (Bucur); 2007; 102(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17410726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-resolution 3D micro-CT imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary analysis. Willekens I; Van de Casteele E; Buls N; Temmermans F; Jansen B; Deklerck R; de Mey J BMC Cancer; 2014 Jan; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24393444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis. Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microcalcification morphological descriptors and parenchyma fractal dimension hierarchically interact in breast cancer: A diagnostic perspective. Verma G; Luciani ML; Palombo A; Metaxa L; Panzironi G; Pediconi F; Giuliani A; Bizzarri M; Todde V Comput Biol Med; 2018 Feb; 93():1-6. PubMed ID: 29247886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration. Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ultrasound and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in determining benign and malignant breast lesions using pathology as a gold standard, in 102 Chinese women. Yang L; Zhou C Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 30843008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]