These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25222925)

  • 1. Insights from San Francisco match rank lists, part II: are programs doing it wrong?
    Nagarkar PA; Malafa M; Janis JE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 73(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 25222925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insights from the San Francisco Match rank list data: how many interviews does it take to match?
    Malafa MM; Nagarkar PA; Janis JE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 24667882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
    Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent trends in applicants and the matching process for the integrated plastic surgery match.
    Super N; Tieman J; Boucher K; Rockwell WB; Agarwal JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 23407248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
    Wood JS; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eliminating Geographic Bias Improves Match Results: An Analysis of Program Preferences and Their Impact on Rank Lists and Results.
    Nagarkar PA; Janis JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jul; 142(1):82e-88e. PubMed ID: 29649057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
    Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions.
    Azoury SC; Kozak GM; Stranix JT; Colen DL; Piwnica-Worms W; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31405800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fellowship Match Outcomes in the U.S. From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match.
    Zafar S; Bressler NM; Golnik KC; Srikumaran D; Ghous Z; Ip S; Chen X; Woreta FA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 218():261-267. PubMed ID: 32574772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do general surgery applicants really want to be general surgeons?
    Andriole DA; Jeffe DB; Klingensmith M
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16520120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match.
    Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011.
    Yousuf SJ; Jones LS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 22218141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Poly-Specialty Application Practices of Medical Students Applying to Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency.
    McMackin KK; Trani J; Carpenter JP; Batista PM; Fadoul MA; Hoell NG; Lombardi JV
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Nov; 69():125-132. PubMed ID: 32554201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?
    Durham SR; Donaldson K; Grady MS; Benzil DL
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 129(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 29882698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How the Reputation of Orthopaedic Residency Programs Is Associated with Orthopaedic Fellowship Match Results.
    Krueger CA; Helms JR; Bell AJ; Israel H; Cannada LK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Mar; 102(6):e28. PubMed ID: 31913867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residency Program Reputation Influences the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Match Results.
    Krueger CA; Chisari E; Israel H; Cannada LK
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2676-2681. PubMed ID: 32444232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inefficiencies in Residency Matching Associated with Gale-Shapley Algorithms.
    Wu Y; Taravati P; Yanagihara RT; Francis CE; Blazes M; Lee CS; Lee AY; Van Gelder RN
    J Acad Ophthalmol (2017); 2021 Jul; 13(2):e175-e182. PubMed ID: 37325553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The plastic surgery match: predicting success and improving the process.
    Claiborne JR; Crantford JC; Swett KR; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jun; 70(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 23673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
    Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.