These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25223251)

  • 1. A perspective on biological monitoring guidance values.
    Cocker J
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 25223251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Integration of biological and workplace monitoring as an efficient control of chemical exposure].
    Gelormini A; Barbaro M; Cidaria D; Dall'Olio M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2005; 27(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 16240587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA).
    Manno M; Viau C; ; Cocker J; Colosio C; Lowry L; Mutti A; Nordberg M; Wang S
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Jan; 192(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19446015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An occupational hygiene investigation of exposure to acrylamide and the role for urinary S-carboxyethyl-cysteine (CEC) as a biological marker.
    Bull PJ; Brooke RK; Cocker J; Jones K; Warren N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Nov; 49(8):683-90. PubMed ID: 16141254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biological monitoring guidance values for chemical incidents.
    Cocker J; Jones K; Bos PM
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 24973493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological monitoring for isocyanates.
    Cocker J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21252056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Biological monitoring of chemical exposure].
    Jakubowski M
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15156762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance values for the biomonitoring of occupational exposure. State of the art.
    Aitio A
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 17017366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability.
    Manini P; De Palma G; Mutti A
    Toxicol Lett; 2007 Feb; 168(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 17157456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing isocyanate exposures in polyurethane industry sectors using biological and air monitoring methods.
    Creely KS; Hughson GW; Cocker J; Jones K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):609-21. PubMed ID: 16731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Fractional and component composition of dust in the air of workplace at machinery enterprise].
    Maĭ IV; Zagorodnov SIu; Maks AA
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (12):12-5. PubMed ID: 23461182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials.
    Ramachandran G; Ostraat M; Evans DE; Methner MM; O'Shaughnessy P; D'Arcy J; Geraci CL; Stevenson E; Maynard A; Rickabaugh K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Nov; 8(11):673-85. PubMed ID: 22023547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals.
    Hedmer M; Wohlfart G
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1968-75. PubMed ID: 22692549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics in biomonitoring for occupational health.
    Manno M; Sito F; Licciardi L
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 25447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
    Gromiec J
    Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines for personal exposure monitoring of chemicals: Part VI.
    ; Hashimoto H; Yamada K; Hori H; Kumagai S; Murata M; Nagoya T; Nakahara H; Mochida N
    J Occup Health; 2018 Jul; 60(4):275-280. PubMed ID: 29899198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for personal exposure monitoring of chemicals: Part V.
    ; Hashimoto H; Yamada K; Hori H; Kumagai S; Murata M; Nagoya T; Nakahara H; Mochida N
    J Occup Health; 2018 May; 60(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 29669968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.
    Kuempel ED; Geraci CL; Schulte PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):491-505. PubMed ID: 22752094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Respiratory diseases in metallurgy production workers].
    Shliapnikov DM; Vlasova EM; Ponomareva TA
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (12):16-9. PubMed ID: 23461183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.