197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25223712)
1. The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal.
Pitchers WR; Klingenberg CP; Tregenza T; Hunt J; Dworkin I
J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2163-76. PubMed ID: 25223712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.
Pitchers WR; Brooks R; Jennions MD; Tregenza T; Dworkin I; Hunt J
J Evol Biol; 2013 May; 26(5):1060-78. PubMed ID: 23530814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional morphology of tegmina-based stridulation in the relict species
Chivers BD; Béthoux O; Sarria-S FA; Jonsson T; Mason AC; Montealegre-Z F
J Exp Biol; 2017 Mar; 220(Pt 6):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 28082619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual selection and population divergence II. Divergence in different sexual traits and signal modalities in field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
Pascoal S; Mendrok M; Wilson AJ; Hunt J; Bailey NW
Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1614-1626. PubMed ID: 28369840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.
Schneider WT; Rutz C; Hedwig B; Bailey NW
Biol Lett; 2018 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 29445043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago.
Simmons LW; Thomas ML; Gray B; Zuk M
J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2249-57. PubMed ID: 25228329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inbreeding and courtship calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus.
Drayton JM; Milner RN; Hall MD; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 21054622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inbreeding and advertisement calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus: laboratory and field experiments.
Drayton JM; Milner RN; Hunt J; Jennions MD
Evolution; 2010 Oct; 64(10):3069-83. PubMed ID: 20662924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing the role of trait reversal in evolutionary diversification using song loss in wild crickets.
Bailey NW; Pascoal S; Montealegre-Z F
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(18):8941-8949. PubMed ID: 30992379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid convergent evolution in wild crickets.
Pascoal S; Cezard T; Eik-Nes A; Gharbi K; Majewska J; Payne E; Ritchie MG; Zuk M; Bailey NW
Curr Biol; 2014 Jun; 24(12):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 24881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mechanics of acoustic signal evolution in field crickets.
Godthi V; Balakrishnan R; Pratap R
J Exp Biol; 2022 Mar; 225(Suppl_1):. PubMed ID: 35258611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Purring Crickets: The Evolution of a Novel Sexual Signal.
Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gurule-Small GA; Hallagan CJ; Wilson JD
Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30444653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ground offers acoustic efficiency gains for crickets and other calling animals.
Brandt EE; Duke S; Wang H; Mhatre N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(46):e2302814120. PubMed ID: 37934821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic evolution in crickets: need for phylogenetic study and a reappraisal of signal effectiveness.
Desutter-Grandcolas L; Robillard T
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2004 Jun; 76(2):301-15. PubMed ID: 15258644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structural biomechanics determine spectral purity of bush-cricket calls.
Chivers BD; Jonsson T; Soulsbury CD; Montealegre-Z F
Biol Lett; 2017 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 29187608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multivariate sexual selection on male tegmina in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae).
Ower GD; Hunt J; Sakaluk SK
J Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 30(2):338-351. PubMed ID: 27917558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
