182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25224703)
1. My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.
Baess P; Prinz W
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 233(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25224703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
Umebayashi K; Okita T
Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response inhibition is more effortful than response activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
Neuroreport; 2017 May; 28(7):404-407. PubMed ID: 28272263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotional arousal elicited by irrelevant stimuli affects event-related potentials (ERPs) during response inhibition.
Zhao D; Lin H; Xie S; Liu Z
Physiol Behav; 2019 Jul; 206():134-142. PubMed ID: 30954488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combined forced-attention dichotic listening - Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation.
Bedoin N; Abadie R; Krzonowski J; Ferragne E; Marcastel A
Neuropsychology; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1136-1150. PubMed ID: 31380670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish one's own from a partner's contributions to a joint action.
Bolt NK; Loehr JD
Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108804. PubMed ID: 38670429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
Müller R
Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):464-86. PubMed ID: 25957279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The social Simon effect in the tactile sensory modality: a negative finding.
Pérusseau-Lambert A; Anastassova M; Boukallel M; Chetouani M; Grynszpan O
Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 30993409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.
de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):397-404. PubMed ID: 21424844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
