These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25224777)

  • 1. Influence of anchoring on miscarriage risk perception associated with amniocentesis.
    Nuccio R; Hashmi SS; Mastrobattista J; Noblin SJ; Refuerzo J; Smith JL; Singletary CN
    J Genet Couns; 2015 Apr; 24(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 25224777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?
    Hoskovec J; Mastrobattista JM; Johnston D; Kerrigan A; Robbins-Furman P; Wicklund CA
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18236427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis.
    Tercyak KP; Johnson SB; Roberts SF; Cruz AC
    Patient Educ Couns; 2001 Apr; 43(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 11311841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of IVF, multiple gestation and miscarriage on the acceptance of genetic amniocentesis.
    Elimian A; Demsky M; Figueroa R; Ogburn P; Spitzer AR; Gerald Quirk J
    Prenat Diagn; 2003 Jun; 23(6):501-3. PubMed ID: 12813766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the decision-making process regarding amniocentesis following a screen-positive maternal serum screen result.
    Kobelka C; Mattman A; Langlois S
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 May; 29(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 19242922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of genetic counseling on decisions of pregnant women aged 35 years or over regarding amniocentesis in Turkey.
    Ilgin-Ruhi H; Yürür-Kutlay N; Tükün A; Bökesoy I
    Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15953401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amniocentesis: the struggle to choose.
    Hogarth W
    Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(3):E16. PubMed ID: 14986618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.
    Miron-Shatz T; Rapaport SR; Srebnik N; Hanoch Y; Rabinowitz J; Doniger GM; Levi L; Rolison JJ; Tsafrir A
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Feb; 27(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 28616831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors in a woman's decision to undergo genetic amniocentesis for advanced maternal age.
    Davies BL; Doran TA
    Nurs Res; 1982; 31(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 6214766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.
    Vergani P; Locatelli A; Biffi A; Ciriello E; Zagarella A; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 12224068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes of women of childbearing age towards prenatal diagnosis in southeastern France.
    Julian-Reynier C; Macquart-Moulin G; Moatti JP; Loundou A; Aurran Y; Chabal F; Aymé S
    Prenat Diagn; 1993 Jul; 13(7):613-27. PubMed ID: 8415427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.
    Sadlecki P; Grabiec M; Walentowicz P; Walentowicz-Sadlecka M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 29769050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological effects of amniocentesis on women and their spouses: importance of the testing period and genetic counseling.
    Kukulu K; Buldukoglu K; Keser I; Keser I; Simşek M; Mendilcioğlu I; Lüleci G
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Mar; 27(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16752871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience.
    Pauker SP; Pauker SG
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1987; 23(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 3593909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making and attitudes towards invasive prenatal diagnosis in the early second trimester.
    Willruth A; Vieten J; Berg C; Gembruch U; Geipel A
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 20091463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Psychosocial aspects of the decision to utilize prenatal diagnosis--results of an empirical study].
    Scholz C; Endres M; Zach K; Murken J
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989 Jun; 51(6):278-84. PubMed ID: 2526936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
    Kaing A; Rosen MP; Quinn MM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2047-2057. PubMed ID: 32756971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effectiveness of different counseling methods before second trimester genetic amniocentesis in Thailand.
    Hanprasertpong T; Rattanaprueksachart R; Janwadee S; Geater A; Kor-anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Hanprasertpong J
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Dec; 33(12):1189-93. PubMed ID: 23963662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The amniocentesis decision: an explicit guide for parents.
    Pauker SP; Pauker SG
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1979; 15(5C):289-324. PubMed ID: 160805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A patient's reaction to amniocentesis.
    Brewster A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):443-4. PubMed ID: 6462578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.