These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2522506)

  • 1. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they?
    Monsell S; Doyle MC; Haggard PN
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 2522506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 12412895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
    Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word reading and picture naming in Italian.
    Bates E; Burani C; D'Amico S; Barca L
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):986-99. PubMed ID: 11820758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.
    Frost R; Forster KI; Deutsch A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):829-56. PubMed ID: 9265076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Lee CL; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1061-5. PubMed ID: 16791104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process.
    Norris D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):327-57. PubMed ID: 16637764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
    Cortese MJ; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The attentional control of lexical processing pathways: reversing the word frequency effect.
    Balota DA; Law MB; Zevin JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1081-9. PubMed ID: 11126932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: a test of the multiple read-out model.
    Sears CR; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1537-54. PubMed ID: 10598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capacity limitations in visual word processing.
    Mullin PA; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 2522521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.
    Lewellen MJ; Goldinger SD; Pisoni DB; Greene BG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1993 Sep; 122(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 8371087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.