These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2522522)

  • 1. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies.
    Cleland AA; Gaskell MG; Quinlan PT; Tamminen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):104-19. PubMed ID: 16478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.
    Hayman CA; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probe-detection times during the reading of easy and difficult text.
    Inhoff AW; Fleming K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):339-51. PubMed ID: 2522519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2141355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
    Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.
    Measso G; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(7):635-46. PubMed ID: 2215875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary task modality, expectancy, and the measurement of attentional capacity.
    Proctor RW; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 528962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric specialization for word classes with visual presentations and lexical decision task.
    Hernandez S; Nieto A; Barroso J
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Nov; 20(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 1449766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.