These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2522524)

  • 21. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):537-42. PubMed ID: 24972648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability.
    Rayner K; Slattery TJ; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):514-28. PubMed ID: 21463086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Rayner K; Cook AE; Juhasz BJ; Frazier L
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):467-82. PubMed ID: 17018184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.
    Plummer P; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):275-83. PubMed ID: 23937235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.
    Altarriba J; Kroll JF; Sholl A; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 8757496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Libben MR; Titone DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words.
    Pollatsek A; Hyönä J; Bertram R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):820-33. PubMed ID: 10811178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Information influences the pattern of eye fixations during sentence comprehension.
    Underwood G; Bloomfield R; Clews S
    Perception; 1988; 17(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 3226868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):967-984. PubMed ID: 37883049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.
    Inhoff AW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 2353591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.