These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25225389)

  • 1. Science communication as political communication.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. PubMed ID: 25225389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating science in social settings.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. PubMed ID: 23940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating science in politicized environments.
    Lupia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. PubMed ID: 23940336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto.
    Eagleman DM
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(30):12147-9. PubMed ID: 23884922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Political implications of science popularisation strategies: Frontiers of S cience.
    Burns M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):518-30. PubMed ID: 26265711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.
    Caulfield T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):337-9. PubMed ID: 15245905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The changing uses of accuracy in science communication.
    Hansen A
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Oct; 25(7):760-774. PubMed ID: 26960909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.
    Peters HP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14102-9. PubMed ID: 23940312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.
    Gerasimova K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):455-477. PubMed ID: 28597219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific communication in a post-truth society.
    Iyengar S; Massey DS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(16):7656-7661. PubMed ID: 30478050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science?
    Hivon M; Lehoux P; Denis JL; Rock M
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jan; 19(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 20533791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disputed climate science in the media: do countries matter?
    Grundmann R; Scott M
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 23825269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social media & stem cell science: examining the discourse.
    Adams A; Lomax G; Santarini A
    Regen Med; 2011 Nov; 6(6 Suppl):121-4. PubMed ID: 21999274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
    Nisbet M; Markowitz EM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88473. PubMed ID: 24558393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences.
    Suldovsky B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 27117769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New media landscapes and the science information consumer.
    Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14096-101. PubMed ID: 23940316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.