These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25225553)

  • 1. A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry.
    Tarighi P; Khoroushi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jul; 11(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 25225553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemostatic gingival retraction agents and their impact on prosthodontic treatment steps: A narrative review.
    Maischberger C; Stawarczyk B; von Hajmasy A; Liebermann A
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):719-732. PubMed ID: 30202835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: a systematic review.
    Bernades Kde O; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP; Garcia FC; Pereira PN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1120-8. PubMed ID: 25359643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
    Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination Effect of Hemostatic and Disinfecting Agents on Micro-leakage of Restorations Bonded with Different Bonding Systems.
    H F; F S; Sc A; B A
    J Dent Biomater; 2016 Sep; 3(3):292-298. PubMed ID: 28959756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of caries-affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques.
    Sirin Karaarslan E; Yildiz E; Cebe MA; Yegin Z; Ozturk B
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 22687577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Cavity Contamination by Blood and Hemostatic Agents on Marginal Adaptation of Composite Restorations.
    Groddeck S; Attin T; Tauböck TT
    J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(3):259-264. PubMed ID: 28580463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.
    Sofan E; Sofan A; Palaia G; Tenore G; Romeo U; Migliau G
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2017; 8(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 28736601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry.
    Cardoso MV; de Almeida Neves A; Mine A; Coutinho E; Van Landuyt K; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56 Suppl 1():31-44. PubMed ID: 21564114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment.
    Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Mattar D; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):647-60. PubMed ID: 14531614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directly Placed Restorative Materials: Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Schwendicke F; Göstemeyer G; Blunck U; Paris S; Hsu LY; Tu YK
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jun; 95(6):613-22. PubMed ID: 26912220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents.
    Khoroushi M; Shirban F; Sahraneshin-Samani M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Apr; 8(2):e178-83. PubMed ID: 27034759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of hemostatic agent on marginal gaps of class V giomer restorations.
    Kimyai S; Pournaghi-Azar F; Mohammadi N; Babri M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 May; 9(5):e672-e676. PubMed ID: 28512545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
    Salim S; Santini A; Husham A
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review.
    Nair P; Hickel R; Ilie N
    Am J Dent; 2017 Jun; 30(3):156-164. PubMed ID: 29178762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry.
    Ozer F; Blatz MB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jan; 34(1):12-4, 16, 18; quiz 20, 30. PubMed ID: 23550327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.