These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25225962)
1. Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study. Gralnek IM; Suissa A; Domanov S Endoscopy; 2014 Oct; 46(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 25225962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy. Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Siersema PD; Carr-Locke DL; Halpern Z; Santo E; Domanov S Endoscopy; 2013 Sep; 45(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 23939509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy. Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection. Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos). Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide angle of view: a clinical study. Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Oka S; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Matsumoto T Endoscopy; 2015 May; 47(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 25412088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Pancolonic Retroflexed Viewing Using a Short-turn Radius Colonoscope. Robles-Medranda C; Soria-Alcívar M; Oleas R; Vargas M; Ospina J; Abarca F; Puga-Tejada M; Baquerizo-Burgos J; Pitanga-Lukashok H J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019; 53(10):731-736. PubMed ID: 31135633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of the Extra Wide Angle View (EWAVE) colonoscope for the detection of colorectal lesions. Bronzwaer MES; Dekker E; Weingart V; Groth S; Pioche M; Rivory J; Beyna T; Neuhaus H; Ponchon T; Allescher H; Fockens P; Rösch T Endoscopy; 2018 Jan; 50(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 29132174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Biecker E; Floer M; Heinecke A; Ströbel P; Böhme R; Schepke M; Meister T J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015; 49(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24921209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. Triadafilopoulos G; Li J Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 18543136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD; Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cap, hood, cuff, and balloon - what next for colonoscopy? Mohammed N; Rembacken B Endoscopy; 2015 Jun; 47(6):564. PubMed ID: 26030894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study. Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of full-spectrum endoscopy: Korea's first full-spectrum endoscopy colonoscopic trial. Song JY; Cho YH; Kim MA; Kim JA; Lee CT; Lee MS World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 22(8):2621-9. PubMed ID: 26937150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes. Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study. Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]