124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25226914)
1. A comparison of brain phantom relative permittivity with CST simulation library and existing research.
Chew KM; Seman N; Sudirman R; Yong CY
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2161-7. PubMed ID: 25226914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical conductivity and permittivity maps of brain tissues derived from water content based on T
Michel E; Hernandez D; Lee SY
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1094-1103. PubMed ID: 26946979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dielectric properties of porcine cerebrospinal tissues at microwave frequencies: in vivo, in vitro and systematic variation with age.
Peyman A; Holden SJ; Watts S; Perrott R; Gabriel C
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2229-45. PubMed ID: 17404466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflection coefficient detection of simulation models for microwave imaging simulation system.
Chew KM; Sudirman R; Seman N; Yong CY
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 24211899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative conductivity and permittivity imaging of the human brain using electric properties tomography.
Voigt T; Katscher U; Doessel O
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Aug; 66(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 21773985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there any information on micro-structure in microwave tomography of bone tissue?
Irastorza RM; Carlevaro CM; Vericat F
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Aug; 35(8):1173-80. PubMed ID: 23352612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local complex permittivity measurements of porcine skin tissue in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 15 GHz by evanescent microscopy.
Kleismit RA; Kozlowski G; Foy BD; Hull BE; Kazimierczuk M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):699-713. PubMed ID: 19131676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current density impedance imaging.
Hasanov KF; Ma AW; Nachman AI; Joy ML
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1301-9. PubMed ID: 18753045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical properties tomography in the human brain at 1.5, 3, and 7T: a comparison study.
van Lier AL; Raaijmakers A; Voigt T; Lagendijk JJ; Luijten PR; Katscher U; van den Berg CA
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):354-63. PubMed ID: 23401276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulations and phantom evaluations of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for breast cancer detection.
Sadleir RJ; Sajib SZ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
J Magn Reson; 2013 May; 230():40-9. PubMed ID: 23435264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrical impedance tomography using the extended Kalman filter.
Trigo FC; Gonzalez-Lima R; Amato MB
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 14723496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue dielectric measurement using an interstitial dipole antenna.
Wang P; Brace CL
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 21914566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image reconstruction in microwave tomography using a dielectric Debye model.
Fhager A; Gustafsson M; Nordebo S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 21937340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of emboli in vessels using electrical impedance measurements--phantom and electrodes.
Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S111-8. PubMed ID: 15798224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Lee BI; Lee SH; Kim TS; Kwon O; Woo EJ; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1912-20. PubMed ID: 16285395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
