BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227013)

  • 21. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance.
    Paquerault S; Yarusso LM; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 15487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SVM and neural networks comparison in mammographic CAD.
    García-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macias M; González-Velasco H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3204-7. PubMed ID: 18002677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
    Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
    Ke L; He W; Kang Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension.
    Park SC; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19524455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme using a filter bank for detection of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Yamamoto K; Watanabe R; Namba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 16485756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses using scalable image retrieval.
    Jiang M; Zhang S; Li H; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):783-92. PubMed ID: 25361497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Watanabe R; Namba K; Takeda K; Yamamoto K; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1219-28. PubMed ID: 16979071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
    Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
    Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
    Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.