209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227013)
41. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of arterial calcification in mammograms by random walks.
Cheng JZ; Cole EB; Pisano ED; Shen D
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():713-24. PubMed ID: 19694306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.
Tanaka T; Nitta N; Ohta S; Kobayashi T; Kano A; Tsuchiya K; Murakami Y; Kitahara S; Wakamiya M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2886-95. PubMed ID: 19585121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí J
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):286-93. PubMed ID: 18051070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography.
Muralidhar GS; Bovik AC; Giese JD; Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Haygood TM; Stephens TW; Markey MK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80. PubMed ID: 20529728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Automated effect-specific mammographic pattern measures.
Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Tanko LB; Nielsen M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18672423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: Study on applying adaboost with SVM-based component classifiers.
Dehghan F; Abrishami-Moghaddam H; Giti M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4789-92. PubMed ID: 19163787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Improving the Automated Detection of Calcifications Using Adaptive Variance Stabilization.
Bria A; Marrocco C; Borges LR; Molinara M; Marchesi A; Mordang JJ; Karssemeijer N; Tortorella F
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29994062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Computer aided diagnosis of calcifications in mammograms].
Li G; Liu H; Cheng J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 21485207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Knowledge-discovery incorporated evolutionary search for microcalcification detection in breast cancer diagnosis.
Peng Y; Yao B; Jiang J
Artif Intell Med; 2006 May; 37(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 16343872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
