BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227022)

  • 1. The effect of tumor size on the imaging diagnosis: a study based on simulation.
    Qiao H; Wang L; Li D; Wang D; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3129-36. PubMed ID: 25227022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients without LN metastasis.
    Yoo IeR; Chung SK; Park HL; Choi WH; Kim YK; Lee KY; Wang YP
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3091-103. PubMed ID: 25227018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of standard uptake value in dual-head coincidence system.
    Geng J; Chen Y; Chen S; Si H; Tian J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 17611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.
    Miwa K; Inubushi M; Wagatsuma K; Nagao M; Murata T; Koyama M; Koizumi M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 24418285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adrenal masses in patients with cancer: PET/CT characterization with combined CT histogram and standardized uptake value PET analysis.
    Perri M; Erba P; Volterrani D; Guidoccio F; Lazzeri E; Caramella D; Mariani G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 21701032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided detection (CAD) and assessment of malignant lesions in the liver and lung using a novel PET/CT software tool: initial results.
    Hahn S; Heusner T; Zhou X; Zhan Y; Peng Z; Hamami M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 19859858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer.
    Liao S; Penney BC; Zhang H; Suzuki K; Pu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 22142679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
    Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT.
    Zytoon AA; Murakami K; El-Kholy MR; El-Shorbagy E; Ebied O
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 18395387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusion weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): does the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlate with tracer uptake (SUV)?
    Regier M; Derlin T; Schwarz D; Laqmani A; Henes FO; Groth M; Buhk JH; Kooijman H; Adam G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2913-8. PubMed ID: 22197090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SUV correction for injection errors in FDG-PET examination.
    Miyashita K; Takahashi N; Oka T; Asakawa S; Lee J; Shizukuishi K; Inoue T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 21(10):607-13. PubMed ID: 18092139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to estimate the length of gross tumor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
    Zhong X; Yu J; Zhang B; Mu D; Zhang W; Li D; Han A; Song P; Li H; Yang G; Kong FM; Fu Z
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jan; 73(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 18538492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic MRI, dynamic multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), and coregistered 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT: comparative study of capability for management of pulmonary nodules.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Maniwa Y; Nishimura Y; Ohbayashi C; Sugimura K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1284-95. PubMed ID: 18504748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
    Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans.
    Freedman NM; Sundaram SK; Kurdziel K; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Carson JM; Sellers D; Libutti SK; Yang JC; Bacharach SL
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12483409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.
    Adams MC; Turkington TG; Wilson JM; Wong TZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 20651185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans.
    Brenner W; Vernon C; Muzi M; Mankoff DA; Link JM; Conrad EU; Eary JF
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1493-500. PubMed ID: 15347716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.