These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227092)

  • 21. Nonlinear analysis of the performance and reliability of wavelet singularity detection based denoising for Doppler ultrasound fetal heart rate signals.
    Papadimitriou S; Bezerianos A
    Int J Med Inform; 1999 Jan; 53(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 10075130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The application of EMD in activity recognition based on a single triaxial accelerometer.
    Liao M; Guo Y; Qin Y; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1533-9. PubMed ID: 26405917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Real-time signal processing for fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ibrahimy MI; Ahmed F; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 12665042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Comparison of Five Algorithms for Fetal Magnetocardiography Signal Extraction.
    Escalona-Vargas D; Wu HT; Frasch MG; Eswaran H
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Sep; 9(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 29582244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observation on validity of the five-tier system for fetal heart rate pattern interpretation proposed by Japan Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Sadaka A; Furuhashi M; Minami H; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Ishikawa K
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 21923306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison and evaluation of existing methods for the extraction of low amplitude electrocardiographic signals: a possible approach to transabdominal fetal ECG.
    Ungureanu GM; Bergmans JW; Oei SG; Ungureanu A; Wolf W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Apr; 54(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 19290851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour.
    Valensise H; Facchinetti F; Vasapollo B; Giannini F; Monte ID; Arduini D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16459010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transabdominal fetal heart rate detection using NIR photopleythysmography: instrumentation and clinical results.
    Gan KB; Zahedi E; Mohd Ali MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 56(8):2075-82. PubMed ID: 19403354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A DSP-based design method for detecting fetal heart rate signals].
    Yang XF; Li P; Zhang DL; Bian ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 30(6):413-5. PubMed ID: 17300006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements.
    Kribèche A; Tranquart F; Kouame D; Pourcelot L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17276580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Studies on features of fetal movement and development of human fetus with use of fetal actogram].
    Tatsumura M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Aug; 43(8):864-73. PubMed ID: 1919177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward quantitative fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Cao H; Lake DE; Ferguson JE; Chisholm CA; Griffin MP; Moorman JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jan; 53(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 16402610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
    Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detecting movement-related EEG change by wavelet decomposition-based neural networks trained with single thumb movement.
    Chen CW; Lin CC; Ju MS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):802-14. PubMed ID: 17317306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An application of symbolic dynamics for FHRV assessment.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Improta G; D'Addio G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():123-7. PubMed ID: 22874165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wavelet filtering of fetal phonocardiography: A comparative analysis.
    Tomassini S; Strazza A; Sbrollini A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Fioretti S; Burattini L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(5):6034-6046. PubMed ID: 31499751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fetal heart rate baselines in twins. Interobserver agreement in antepartum estimation.
    Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Calejo L; Ayres-de-Campos D; Patrício B; Pereira-Leite L
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10710739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A method for the automatic reconstruction of fetal cardiac signals from magnetocardiographic recordings.
    Mantini D; Alleva G; Comani S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4763-81. PubMed ID: 16204871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis.
    Xu L; Redman CW; Payne SJ; Georgieva A
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1357-71. PubMed ID: 24854596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.