These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

836 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227111)

  • 1. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course.
    McNulty JA; Espiritu BR; Hoyt AE; Ensminger DC; Chandrasekhar AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24596276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online quizzes promote inconsistent improvements on in-class test performance in introductory anatomy and physiology.
    Brown GA; Bice MR; Shaw BS; Shaw I
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 26031720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
    Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Team-based learning in anatomy: an efficient, effective, and economical strategy.
    Vasan NS; DeFouw DO; Compton S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(6):333-9. PubMed ID: 21998012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
    Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
    Mitra NK; Barua A
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculum.
    Hortsch M; Mangrulkar RS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):478-83. PubMed ID: 25641923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human structure in six and one-half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula.
    Halliday N; O'Donoghue D; Klump KE; Thompson B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24996159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified team-based learning strategy to improve human anatomy learning: A pilot study at the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla, Colombia.
    Martínez EG; Tuesca R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 24623645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography-enhanced anatomy course using enterprise visualization.
    May H; Cohen H; Medlej B; Kornreich L; Peled N; Hershkovitz I
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 23401203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
    Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
    Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology.
    Vasan NS; DeFouw DO; Holland BK
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19177372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.