145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227188)
21. Tips and tricks for a correct interpretation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Campo I; Granata A; Derchi LE; Piccoli G; Cassetti P; Cova MA; Bertolotto M
Radiol Med; 2024 Apr; 129(4):536-548. PubMed ID: 38512611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Potential contrast improvement in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging using EMD and EEMD.
Liao AH; Shen CC; Li PC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 20178898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pictorial essay.
Fetzer DT; Rafailidis V; Peterson C; Grant EG; Sidhu P; Barr RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Apr; 43(4):977-997. PubMed ID: 29198008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound.
Dietrich CF; Ignee A; Hocke M; Schreiber-Dietrich D; Greis C
Z Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21391167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Tissue attenuation in small animals on contrast enhanced ultrasound].
Mulé S; De Cesare A; Lucidarme O; Frouin F; Herment A
J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 88(11 Pt 2):1770-6. PubMed ID: 18065941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of multimodality imaging using image fusion with MRI and CEUS in an experimental animal model.
Paprottka PM; Zengel P; Cyran CC; Paprottka KJ; Ingrisch M; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2015; 61(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26519228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Denoising of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Cine Sequences Based on a Multiplicative Model.
Bar-Zion AD; Tremblay-Darveau C; Yin M; Adam D; Foster FS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1969-80. PubMed ID: 25730824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering.
Needles A; Couture O; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1564-73. PubMed ID: 19632763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Perfusion imaging of the kidney using contrast-enhanced phase-inversion ultrasound].
Stoeckelhuber BM; Wiesmann M; Kreft B; Stoeckelhuber M; Weiss HD; Bergmann-Koester CU
Rontgenpraxis; 2004; 55(5):167-74. PubMed ID: 15700653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A preliminary in vitro assessment of polymer-shelled microbubbles in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Sciallero C; Paradossi G; Trucco A
Ultrasonics; 2012 Mar; 52(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 22133737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contrast enhanced ultrasound by real-time spatiotemporal filtering of ultrafast images.
Desailly Y; Tissier AM; Correas JM; Wintzenrieth F; Tanter M; Couture O
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 27973352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Kim H; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 15653236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Plane wave versus focused transmissions for contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging: the role of parameter settings and the effects of flow rate on contrast measurements.
Moghimirad E; Bamber J; Harris E
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095003. PubMed ID: 30917360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. SUSHI: Sparsity-Based Ultrasound Super-Resolution Hemodynamic Imaging.
Bar-Zion A; Solomon O; Tremblay-Darveau C; Adam D; Eldar YC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Dec; 65(12):2365-2380. PubMed ID: 30295619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Advances in ultrasound.
Harvey CJ; Pilcher JM; Eckersley RJ; Blomley MJ; Cosgrove DO
Clin Radiol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):157-77. PubMed ID: 11952309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Post-processing radio-frequency signal based on deep learning method for ultrasonic microbubble imaging.
Dai M; Li S; Wang Y; Zhang Q; Yu J
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Sep; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 31511011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-Frequency Nonlinear Doppler Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Blood Flow.
Bruce M; Hannah A; Hammond R; Khaing ZZ; Tremblay-Darveau C; Burns PN; Hofstetter CP
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Sep; 67(9):1776-1784. PubMed ID: 32275589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging Methods for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Averkiou MA; Bruce MF; Powers JE; Sheeran PS; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 46(3):498-517. PubMed ID: 31813583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An ultrasonic microbubble semi-intermodulated imaging technique.
Wu CY; Tsao J; Chou YH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1199-210. PubMed ID: 16176787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
