239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227197)
21. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Contribution of sonoelastography to the characterization of breast lesions].
Vanhoutte A; Fellah L; Galant C; d'Hoore W; Berlière M; Leconte I
JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(5):187-94. PubMed ID: 19051937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement in Ultrasound BI-RADS Classification and Real-Time Elastography Tsukuba Score Assessment of Breast Lesions.
Schwab F; Redling K; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Schoenenberger CA; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2622-2629. PubMed ID: 27503826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of Screening US-detected Breast Masses by Combined Use of Elastography and Color Doppler US with B-Mode US in Women with Dense Breasts: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Lee SH; Chung J; Choi HY; Choi SH; Ryu EB; Ko KH; Koo HR; Park JS; Yi A; Youk JH; Son EJ; Chu AJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Jang MJ; Kook SH; Cha ES; Moon WK
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):660-669. PubMed ID: 28640693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of focal breast lesions by means of elastography.
Fischer T; Sack I; Thomas A
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):816-23. PubMed ID: 23888477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Color Doppler imaging of fibroadenomas of the breast with histopathologic correlation.
Strano S; Gombos EC; Friedland O; Mozes M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Sep; 32(7):317-22. PubMed ID: 15293297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience.
Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yun MB; Gang YZ; Hua Z
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1447-52. PubMed ID: 22799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast elastography: a hospital-based preliminary study in China.
Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yan L; Gang YZ; Lin L
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(3):809-14. PubMed ID: 21039059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differentiation between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma using real-time elastography.
Adamietz BR; Kahmann L; Fasching PA; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Meier-Meitinger M
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E75-9. PubMed ID: 22194044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Liu H; Sun Q; Dai Q; Chen X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1232-8. PubMed ID: 18359145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy.
Kim MY; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Yun BL; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 23901312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of elastographic and B-mode features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification.
Moon WK; Huang CS; Shen WC; Takada E; Chang RF; Joe J; Nakajima M; Kobayashi M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1794-802. PubMed ID: 19767139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in the elasticity of fibroadenoma during the menstrual cycle determined by real-time sonoelastography.
Kılıç F; Kayadibi Y; Kocael P; Velidedeoglu M; Bas A; Bakan S; Aydogan F; Karatas A; Yılmaz MH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25814397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
