227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25227964)
1. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: A single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases.
Kryh CG; Pietersen CA; Rahr HB; Christensen RD; Wamberg P; Lautrup MD
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 25227964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients with invasive lobular breast cancer are less likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery: a population based study in the Netherlands.
Truin W; Roumen RM; Siesling S; van der Heiden-van der Loo M; Duijm LE; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Voogd AC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 22(5):1471-8. PubMed ID: 25323475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical-pathologic features, long term-outcome and surgical treatment in a large series of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Biglia N; Maggiorotto F; Liberale V; Bounous VE; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; D'Alonzo M; Ponzone R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 May; 39(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 23490334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of oncoplastic breast surgery in the management of breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy.
Mazouni C; Naveau A; Kane A; Dunant A; Garbay JR; Leymarie N; Sarfati B; Delaloge S; Rimareix F
Breast; 2013 Dec; 22(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 24054903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
Gupta A; Subhas G; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Gorieil Y; Mittal VK
Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):731-4. PubMed ID: 20698380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical management of lobular carcinoma from a national screening program: a retrospective analysis.
Sharma SD; Barry M; O'Reilly EA; Kell MR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 25441933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
