315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25228054)
1. Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer.
Barentsz MW; Postma EL; van Dalen T; van den Bosch MA; Miao H; Gobardhan PD; van den Hout LE; Pijnappel RM; Witkamp AJ; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; Verkooijen HM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25228054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast conservative surgery and local recurrence.
Rezai M; Kraemer S; Kimmig R; Kern P
Breast; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 2():S100-7. PubMed ID: 26432359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-operative factors indicating risk of multiple operations versus a single operation in women undergoing surgery for screen detected breast cancer.
O'Flynn EA; Currie RJ; Mohammed K; Allen SD; Michell MJ
Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 22789490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between patient age, volume of breast tissue excised, and local recurrence.
Mazeh H; Sagiv I; Katz D; Freund HR; Peretz T; Allweis TM
J Surg Res; 2013 May; 181(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 22795351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies.
Jenkinson AD; Al-Mufti RA; Mohsen Y; Berry MJ; Wells C; Carpenter R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Feb; 27(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11237487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A two-millimetre free margin from invasive tumour minimises residual disease in breast-conserving surgery.
Ward ST; Jones BG; Jewkes AJ
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 20946273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer.
Voguet L; Hébert T; Levêque J; Acker O; Mesbah H; Marret H; Porée P; Body G
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 19628389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of tumor and technical factors associated with positive margins in breast-conservation therapy for nonpalpable malignancy.
Reedijk M; Hodgson N; Gohla G; Boylan C; Goldsmith CH; Foster G; Cornacchi SD; McCready D; Lovrics PJ
Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 22794705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Hennigs A; Fuchs V; Sinn HP; Riedel F; Rauch G; Smetanay K; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Schneeweiss A; Sohn C; Heil J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):1831-7. PubMed ID: 26732272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
