These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25228394)

  • 1. Fitting Emax models to clinical trial dose-response data when the high dose asymptote is ill defined.
    Brain P; Kirby S; Larionov R
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 25228394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive designs for dose-finding studies based on sigmoid Emax model.
    Dragalin V; Hsuan F; Padmanabhan SK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1051-70. PubMed ID: 18027216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fitting E(max) models to clinical trial dose-response data.
    Kirby S; Brain P; Jones B
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 22432133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hypothesis testing and Bayesian estimation using a sigmoid Emax model applied to sparse dose-response designs.
    Thomas N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):657-77. PubMed ID: 17037264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive modelling of dose-response relationships using smoothing splines.
    Kirby S; Colman P; Morris M
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 19205006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of parameter estimation on maximum-likelihood bootstrap analysis.
    Ripplinger J; Abdo Z; Sullivan J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Aug; 56(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 20434567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the efficiency of two-stage response-adaptive designs.
    Dette H; Bornkamp B; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1646-60. PubMed ID: 22865374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous estimation of parameters in the bivariate Emax model.
    Magnusdottir BT; Nyquist H
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3714-23. PubMed ID: 26190048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose-response relationship from longitudinal data with response-dependent dose modification using likelihood methods.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    Biom J; 2012 Jul; 54(4):494-506. PubMed ID: 22641310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
    Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence bounds for nonlinear dose-response relationships.
    Baayen C; Hougaard P
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(27):3546-62. PubMed ID: 26112765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements.
    Nawarathna LS; Choudhary PK
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 25614299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling.
    Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Logistic response models with item interactions.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 22233175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.