These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25228494)

  • 1. Standard Error of Ability Estimates and the Classification Accuracy and Consistency of Binary Decisions.
    Cheng Y; Liu C; Behrens J
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):645-64. PubMed ID: 25228494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):749-771. PubMed ID: 30511327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of decision consistency indices for complex assessments: model based approaches.
    Stearns M; Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 18753697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification accuracy and consistency of computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Morgan DL
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22956358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for the true classification error conditioned on the estimated error.
    Xu Q; Hua J; Braga-Neto U; Xiong Z; Suh E; Dougherty ER
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 5(6):579-89. PubMed ID: 17121434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A priori reliability of tests with cut score.
    Magnano G; Tannoia C; Andrà C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Mar; 80(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 24310845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional reliability coefficients for test scores.
    Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):351-362. PubMed ID: 28383949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of stopping rules for computerized adaptive screening measures using the rating scale model.
    Leroux AJ; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 24992246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer Adaptive Test Stopping Rules Applied to The Flexilevel Shoulder Functioning Test.
    Combs TJ; English KW; Dodd BG; Kang HA
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 30789833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Repeated Ratings to Improve Measurement Precision in Incomplete Rating Designs.
    Jones E; Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(2):148-161. PubMed ID: 29894984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moderators of the internal consistency of error-related negativity scores: A meta-analysis of internal consistency estimates.
    Clayson PE
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13583. PubMed ID: 32324305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the relationship between item exposure and test overlap: item sharing and item pooling.
    Chen SY; Lei PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):205-26. PubMed ID: 19545484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Streamlining the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Weight Loss and Body Contouring Patients: Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the BODY-Q.
    Geerards D; Klassen AF; Hoogbergen MM; van der Hulst RRWJ; van den Berg L; Pusic AL; Gibbons CJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):946e-955e. PubMed ID: 31033817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.
    Wu H; Browne MW
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):571-600. PubMed ID: 25813463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.
    Emons WH; Sijtsma K; Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17402814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Commentary.
    Liu J
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):523-527. PubMed ID: 26630990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of the pass/fail decision for assessments comprised of multiple components.
    Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Jünger J
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc42. PubMed ID: 26483855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.