These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25229010)

  • 1. Caffeine Effects on ERP Components and Performance in an Equiprobable Auditory Go/NoGo Task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    J Caffeine Res; 2014 Sep; 4(3):83-92. PubMed ID: 25229010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caffeine as a Tool to Explore Active Cognitive Processing Stages in Two-Choice Tasks.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM
    J Caffeine Adenosine Res; 2020 Jun; 10(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 32566904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of children's performance and ERP components in the equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Jan; 171():12-19. PubMed ID: 34852243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caffeine affects children's ERPs and performance in an equiprobable go/no-go task: Testing a processing schema.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13330. PubMed ID: 30657186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Child sex differences in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Jul; 177():148-158. PubMed ID: 35605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory stimulus- and response-locked ERP components and behavior.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13538. PubMed ID: 32010995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4041. PubMed ID: 32132630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related processing strategies and go-nogo effects in task-switching: an ERP study.
    Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():177. PubMed ID: 26029072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in normal ageing: Explorations in a fixed interstimulus interval Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():87-101. PubMed ID: 32246974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP Go/NoGo condition effects are better detected with separate PCAs.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():50-64. PubMed ID: 27289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.