These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25229010)

  • 21. Performance and ERP components in the equiprobable go/no-go task: Inhibition in children.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1228-37. PubMed ID: 25959726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sequential Congruency Effects of Reverse Stroop Interference on Event-Related Potential Components for Go- and Nogo-Stimuli.
    Suzuki K
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():678647. PubMed ID: 34393906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prestimulus alpha and beta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Sep; 155():32-40. PubMed ID: 32479772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sequential processing in the classic oddball task: ERP components, probability, and behavior.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13300. PubMed ID: 30456921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brain dynamics in the auditory Go/NoGo task as a function of EEG frequency.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio F; Rushby JA; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Nov; 78(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 20600367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An ERP Study of Response Inhibition in the Auditory Domain in Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.
    Gerhold MM; Jacobson SW; Jacobson JL; Molteno CD; Meintjes EM; Andrew CM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Jan; 41(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 27925227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural correlates of late positivities associated with infrequent visual events and response errors.
    Helenius P; Laasonen M; Hokkanen L; Paetau R; Niemivirta M
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 20600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sequential processing in young and older adults in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 May; 127(5):2273-85. PubMed ID: 27072100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1320-31. PubMed ID: 15134699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nontarget-to-nontarget interval determines the nontarget P300 in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jun; 92(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 24681026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memorygo/no-go task: Inhibition in young adults.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13065. PubMed ID: 29383725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.