BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25229781)

  • 1. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal.
    Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
    Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
    Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
    Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
    Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
    Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
    Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
    Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
    Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diode laser hair removal does not interfere with botulinum toxin A treatment against axillary hyperhidrosis.
    Paul A; Kranz G; Schindl A; Kranz GS; Auff E; Sycha T
    Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Mar; 42(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 20333738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the long-pulsed alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system.
    Al-Dhalimi MA; Kadhum MJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 25803567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ismail SA
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 166(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21999492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
    Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
    Barolet D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Topical liposomal Rose Bengal for photodynamic white hair removal: randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
    Samy N; Fadel M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2014 Apr; 13(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 24719063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and microscopic evaluation of long-term (6 months) epilation effects of the ipulse personal home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) device.
    Trelles MA; Ash C; Town G
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 23331874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
    Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study.
    Handrick C; Alster TS
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jul; 27(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 11442611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hair removal with intense pulsed light.
    El Bedewi AF
    Lasers Med Sci; 2004; 19(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 15278721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems (18-month follow-up).
    Szima GZ; Janka EA; Kovács A; Bortély B; Bodnár E; Sawhney I; Szabó É; Remenyik É
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 16(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 28164458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal.
    Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.