These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25230336)

  • 1. Ligand-based target prediction with signature fingerprints.
    Alvarsson J; Eklund M; Engkvist O; Spjuth O; Carlsson L; Wikberg JE; Noeske T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2647-53. PubMed ID: 25230336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bit silencing in fingerprints enables the derivation of compound class-directed similarity metrics.
    Wang Y; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1754-9. PubMed ID: 18698839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Ewing T; Baber JC; Feher M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17125184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PASS Targets: Ligand-based multi-target computational system based on a public data and naïve Bayes approach.
    Pogodin PV; Lagunin AA; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(10):783-93. PubMed ID: 26305108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-scale similarity search profiling of ChEMBL compound data sets.
    Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1831-9. PubMed ID: 21728295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
    Wei NN; Hamza A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and evaluation of a molecular fingerprint involving the transformation of property descriptor values into a binary classification scheme.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 12870906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction and recombination of fingerprints of different design increase compound recall and the structural diversity of hits.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Feb; 75(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 20028390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rendering conventional molecular fingerprints for virtual screening independent of molecular complexity and size effects.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Jun; 5(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 20425878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
    Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training based on ligand efficiency improves prediction of bioactivities of ligands and drug target proteins in a machine learning approach.
    Sugaya N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2525-37. PubMed ID: 24020509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico target predictions: defining a benchmarking data set and comparison of performance of the multiclass Naïve Bayes and Parzen-Rosenblatt window.
    Koutsoukas A; Lowe R; Kalantarmotamedi Y; Mussa HY; Klaffke W; Mitchell JB; Glen RC; Bender A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1957-66. PubMed ID: 23829430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarity searching using fingerprints of molecular fragments involved in protein-ligand interactions.
    Tan L; Lounkine E; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2308-12. PubMed ID: 19007112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In silico prediction of aqueous solubility: a multimodel protocol based on chemical similarity.
    Chevillard F; Lagorce D; Reynès C; Villoutreix BO; Vayer P; Miteva MA
    Mol Pharm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):3127-35. PubMed ID: 23072744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random reduction in fingerprint bit density improves compound recall in search calculations using complex reference molecules.
    Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jun; 71(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 18466274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profile scaling increases the similarity search performance of molecular fingerprints containing numerical descriptors and structural keys.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1218-25. PubMed ID: 12870914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new ChEMBL dataset for the similarity-based target fishing engine FastTargetPred: Annotation of an exhaustive list of linear tetrapeptides.
    Tanwar S; Auberger P; Gillet G; DiPaola M; Tsaioun K; Villoutreix BO
    Data Brief; 2022 Jun; 42():108159. PubMed ID: 35496477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.