333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25230340)
1. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators.
Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Sivgin S; Keklik E; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Buyukoglan R; Yay M; Cetin M; Unal A
J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators.
Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Yay M; Birekul A; Oztekin M; Sivgin S; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.
Altuntas F; Sari I; Kocyigit I; Kaynar L; Hacioglu S; Ozturk A; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Med Hemother; 2008; 35(5):368-373. PubMed ID: 21512626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments.
Philip J; Biswas AK; Chatterjee T; Mallhi RS
Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 25316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of the Trima Accel cell separator in the double dose plateletpheresis.
Keklik M; Korkmaz S; Kalan U; Sarikoc M; Keklik E
Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Oct; 55(2):240-242. PubMed ID: 27522105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators.
Fontana S; Mordasini L; Keller P; Taleghani BM
Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):2004-10. PubMed ID: 17076857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors.
Strasser EF; Schuster M; Egler K; Bauer J; Weisbach V; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):788-97. PubMed ID: 15847670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions.
Eder AF; Dy BA; DeMerse B; Wagner SJ; Stramer SL; O'Neill EM; Herron RM
Transfusion; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2969-2976. PubMed ID: 28880363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.
Altuntas F; Kocyigit I; Ozturk A; Kaynar L; Sari I; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Apr; 36(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 17369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Type of Cell Separator, Fenwal Amicus vs Fresenius Com Tec, May Influence the Corpuscular Elements Value of the Donor`s Blood.
Landzo E; Aganovic-Musinovic I; Bevanda D; Bogut A; Bevanda M; Bevanda Glibo D; Pravdić D
Psychiatr Danub; 2019 Dec; 31(Suppl 5):821-825. PubMed ID: 32160178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Haemonetics and Trima Accel Cell Separators.
Keklik M; Keklik E; Kalan U; Ozer O; Arik F; Sarikoc M
Ther Apher Dial; 2018 Feb; 22(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 29082642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle plateletpheresis.
Burgstaler EA; Winters JL; Pineda AA
Transfusion; 2004 Nov; 44(11):1612-20. PubMed ID: 15504167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paired crossover study of two plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet product quality and donor comfort.
Flesch BK; Adamzik I; Steppat D; Miller J; Carstensen L; Schapke M; Davey J
Transfusion; 2010 Apr; 50(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 19951314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new apheresis system for the collection of leukoreduced single-donor platelets.
Zingsem J; Strasser E; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Weisbach V; Eckstein R
Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 17524087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practical issues that should be considered when planning the implementation of pathogen reduction technology for plateletpheresis.
Jimenez-Marco T; Mercant C; Lliteras E; Cózar M; Girona-Llobera E
Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Feb; 52(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 25554212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood component collection by apheresis.
Burgstaler EA
J Clin Apher; 2006 Jul; 21(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 15880369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of simulated shipping conditions (24- or 30-hr interruption of agitation) on the in vitro properties of apheresis platelets during 7-day storage.
Wagner SJ; Vassallo R; Skripchenko A; Einarson M; Seetharaman S; Moroff G
Transfusion; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1072-80. PubMed ID: 18373503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the haemonetics MCS cell separator in the collection of apheresis platelets.
Keklik M; Keklik E; Korkmaz S; Aygun B; Arik F; Kilic O; Sarikoc M
Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Dec; 53(3):396-8. PubMed ID: 26283175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the in vitro storage properties of Amicus apheresis platelets collected using single- and double-needle procedures from the same donors.
Wagner SJ; Seetharaman S; Kurtz J
Transfusion; 2012 Mar; 52(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 21880047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of high-dose plateletpheresis with the latest apheresis systems on the same donors.
Picker SM; Radojska SM; Gathof BS
Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1601-8. PubMed ID: 16965590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
