136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25231029)
21. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilitation of cancer patients: treatment concept and proposed criteria for success.
Weischer T; Mohr C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 10453667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors associated with failure of surface-modified implants up to four years of function.
Cosyn J; Vandenbulcke E; Browaeys H; Van Maele G; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 20491819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of prosthetic restorations on bone-lock implants in patients after oral tumor resection.
Kovács AF
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9835838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term results of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes.
Ueda T; Kremer U; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 21483890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants.
Yoo RH; Chuang SK; Erakat MS; Weed M; Dodson TB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16634496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12-15 years.
Ravald N; Dahlgren S; Teiwik A; Gröndahl K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1144-51. PubMed ID: 22762251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retrospective clinical evaluation of an internal tube-in-tube dental implant after 4 years, with special emphasis on peri-implant bone resorption.
Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ophoven F; Wagner W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 22167438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant.
Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ladwein C; Wegener J; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 20156231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Concept of surgical and implant-supported prostheses in the rehabilitation of patients with oral cancer.
Weischer T; Schettler D; Mohr C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):775-81. PubMed ID: 8990640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions.
Vandeweghe S; Ackermann A; Bronner J; Hattingh A; Tschakaloff A; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):281-92. PubMed ID: 19958373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival analysis and clinical evaluation of implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer resection patients over a mean follow-up period of 10 years.
Nelson K; Heberer S; Glatzer C
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 18021829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification.
Nelson K; Stricker A; Raguse JD; Nahles S
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 43(11):871-872. PubMed ID: 27670370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Conventional SLA and chemically modified SLA implants in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus--a randomized controlled trial.
Khandelwal N; Oates TW; Vargas A; Alexander PP; Schoolfield JD; Alex McMahan C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22145978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants.
Stafford GL
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):87-8. PubMed ID: 25343397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
