These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25231069)

  • 21. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study.
    Casarin RC; Ribeiro FV; Sallum AW; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19466233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diamond-coated sonic tips are more efficient for open debridement of molar furcations. A comparative manikin study.
    Auplish G; Needleman IG; Moles DR; Newman HN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 May; 27(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 10847532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Instrumentation of furcation with modified sonic scaler inserts: a study on manikins (II).
    Kocher T; Tersic-Orth B; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Jun; 25(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 9667478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.
    Jotikasthira NE; Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):560-9. PubMed ID: 1447381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of motivation and a new digitized training program on undergraduate dental students during preclinical scaling training.
    Seidel M; Sutor S; Conrad J; Engel AS; Geiken A; Sälzer S; Graetz C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):346. PubMed ID: 33256683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy versus health risks: An in vitro evaluation of power-driven scalers.
    Graetz C; Plaumann A; Bielfeldt J; Tillner A; Sälzer S; Dörfer CE
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2015; 19(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 25810588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments in vitro: the role of operator motivation and self-assessment.
    König J; Rühling A; Schlemme H; Kocher T; Schwahn C; Plagmann HC
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2002 Nov; 6(4):169-75. PubMed ID: 12410668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Study of the influence of different instruments for removing dental deposits on tooth surface].
    Kuchumova ED; Stiuf IaV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(6):27-30. PubMed ID: 17310945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The Perioplaner/Periopolisher. The loss of substance on the root surface and the initial clinical experiences].
    Hänggi D; Ritz L; Rateitschak KH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(12):1535-41. PubMed ID: 1763309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Rüdiger S; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 9552818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of subgingival calculus removal with Er:YAG laser compared to mechanical debridement: an in situ study.
    Eberhard J; Ehlers H; Falk W; Açil Y; Albers HK; Jepsen S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 12795789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root debridement of single-rooted teeth with a diamond-coated sonic scaler insert during flap surgery. A pilot study.
    Kocher T; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Apr; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 10223389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.